Wednesday, November 25, 2015

States are still in a state of recovery

Gov. Rendell and Gov. Christie agree that they'll be forced to impose deeper budget cuts that harm workers and children if Congress doesn't extend recovery aid to states.

States are still in a state of recovery



Gov. Rendell, a Democrat, and Gov. Christie, a Republican, don’t agree on much. But both executives believe they’ll be forced to impose deeper budget cuts that harm workers and children if Congress doesn’t extend aid to states from last year’s economic recovery act. In Pennsylvania, Rendell is counting on an additional $850 million in federal Medicaid assistance to help balance the budget. In New Jersey, Christie is banking on an extra $570 million from Washington.
In all, 30 states are expecting more Medicaid money to help cover budget deficits. The stimulus money is due to expire Dec. 31; the governors want a six-month extension through June 2011. They should get it. The House voted in late May to remove $24 billion of this aid from its bill. The Senate has amended the legislation to restore the money, but final passage is not yet assured. A key vote is expected this week.
Most states don’t have a “plan B” if they don’t receive the money, meaning they’ll be forced to impose layoffs and more cuts in services. Rendell has warned that without the funding, Pennsylvania’s cuts would include eliminating some aid to 90 percent of all hospitals, cutting child-welfare services 25 percent, and reducing rape-crisis programs by 50 percent. Layoffs would be likely. Without the subsidies, states will likely cut education programs, and mental-health services, too.
House lawmakers rejected the Medicaid assistance last month out of concern for increasing the federal deficit, already at record levels. The deficit is a pressing concern, and Congress does need to address it. But deeper cutbacks by states at a time of high unemployment are likely to produce more short-term pain and more lost jobs due to lower demand for services. That will only postpone a recovery.
Assuming they do receive this extra aid from Washington, state officials should consider it a last chance to wean them from the stimulus teat. They must stop writing budgets that include emergency funds that the federal government will eventually end. Pulling the country out of a deep recession and deep deficits is a balancing act that can’t leave out its most vulnerable citizens. This is not the time for Congress to abandon the many states that are still struggling.
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

The Inquirer Editorial Board's Say What? opinion blog showcases the work of the editors and writers who produce the newspaper's daily and Sunday opinion pages.

Find out more about The Inquirer's Editorial Board here.

The Inquirer Editorial Board
Also on
letter icon Newsletter