Monday, July 6, 2015

State has a stake in chicken-and-egg debate

Being the nation’s third-largest egg producer means Pennsylvania should pay close attention to a proposal in Congress to improve the living conditions of egg-laying chickens. The state, though, has not yet joined the movement to ban so-called battery cages, which can house as many as 11 hens in a space little bigger than a microwave oven. That’s an image that should spoil your breakfast.

State has a stake in chicken-and-egg debate

0 comments
Travel Deals

Being the nation’s third-largest egg producer means Pennsylvania should pay close attention to a proposal in Congress to improve the living conditions of egg-laying chickens. The state, though, has not yet joined the movement to ban so-called battery cages, which can house as many as 11 hens in a space little bigger than a microwave oven. That’s an image that should spoil your breakfast.

Ohio, Michigan, and California, where voters in a 2008 referendum mandated hens have enough room to stretch their wings, have banned new battery cages. The Humane Society of the United States and the United Egg Producers trade group are also pushing for more humane standards.

The congressional legislation that has resulted from this unusual alliance shows a good balance between real-world egg-production practices and the idealistic goal of free-range chicken farming. It calls for replacing conventional cages, but only over a lengthy phase-in period stretching out 15-18 years, and with financial protections that allow farmers to fully depreciate existing equipment.

Along with other food-safety standards being imposed, consumers would be armed with new information on production methods used for the eggs they’re buying. Cartons would specify such things as whether the eggs came from “caged hens,” “hens in enriched cages,” “cage-free hens” or “free-range hens.”

This is not just a feel-good initiative, since the Humane Society notes that egg-industry scientists assert that “enriched colony cages are the best all-around solution for hen welfare, industry economics, and an affordable egg supply for consumers.”

For reasons that reportedly stem from antiregulatory fears, pork- and beef-industry trade groups have joined a farmers’ trade association (that also happens to pooh-pooh climate change) in opposing the measure. Congress, though, has a clear mandate to act from the farmers who know best how they want their eggs done.

0 comments
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy:

Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
 
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

The Inquirer Editorial Board's Say What? opinion blog showcases the work of the editors and writers who produce the newspaper's daily and Sunday opinion pages.

Find out more about The Inquirer's Editorial Board here.

The Inquirer Editorial Board
Also on Philly.com
letter icon Newsletter