Saturday, July 4, 2015

Poll: Impact of Megan's Law repeal

In addition to online registries of convicted sex offenders, towns in the last few years enacted laws to keep such criminals from living near schools, parks, day-care centers, and bus stops. But now they're repealing these provisions, as a result of a state Supreme Court ruling in May that invalidated one statute.

Poll: Impact of Megan's Law repeal

0 comments

In addition to online registries of convicted sex offenders, towns in the last few years enacted laws to keep such criminals from living near schools, parks, day-care centers, and bus stops. But now they're repealing these provisions, as a result of a state Supreme Court ruling in May that invalidated one statute.

New Jersey municipalities did the same after the N.J. Supreme Court ruled residency restrictions invalid in 2009.

"The repeals are overdue," said Don Driscoll of the Community Justice Project, who argued the case against Allegheny County before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. "The laws contributed to enhanced risk of public safety, instead of the opposite. They exclude sex offenders from stabilized housing, employment, and treatment, all of which have been identified as factors in recidivism.

As communities move away from policies that treat such offenders as the modern-day equivalent of lepers, will citizens be at greater risk - or will offenders have a better chance of living normal lives without becoming repeat offenders?

Will court-ordered rollbacks of Megan’s Laws make communities less safe from sex offenders?
No, laws focus on “stranger danger” but victims and predictors often know each other
 
  116 (36.8%)
Yes, parents will have less information on offenders in area
 
  91 (28.9%)
No, residency laws only forced predators underground
 
  73 (23.2%)
Yes, laws put offenders on notice
 
  35 (11.1%)
Total votes = 315

Where do you stand on this issue?

Cast your vote now.

0 comments
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy:

Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
 
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

The Inquirer Editorial Board's Say What? opinion blog showcases the work of the editors and writers who produce the newspaper's daily and Sunday opinion pages.

Find out more about The Inquirer's Editorial Board here.

The Inquirer Editorial Board
Also on Philly.com
letter icon Newsletter