The Scudder Falls Bridge heading into New Jersey. A new, $300 million toll bridge may not have room for bikes or pedestrians. (Laurence Kesterson / Staff Photographer)
Along a bucolic stretch of the Delaware River in Bucks County, it would be an absurd planning decision to build a new bridge that made no room for cyclists and hikers to cross between two historic canal trails.
Yet that’s exactly where the Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Commission appears to be heading with its planned, $300 million toll bridge on I-95.
The new Scudder Falls Bridge linking Bucks and Mercer counties will have nine lanes for traffic, but bridge commission officials are crying poor about the cost of adding a walkway.
There are canal paths along each side of the river, stretching north to New Hope and Lambertville. State parks also flank the Delaware on both banks.
So the thought that bridge commission officials would miss an opportunity to provide a crucial link for recreational use of the area is mind-boggling.
Talk about decision-making that’s locked in a time warp: What happened to planning for “green” uses — like cycling and hiking? Or is the bridge commission fixated solely on moving as many people as possible by gas-guzzling cars, trucks, and buses?
Commission officials are seeking comments from the public, with a supposed deadline Thursday. Let them know that not one dime should be spent on a new bridge unless the design also provides a way for people to cross the river on foot and two wheels.
Comment by e-mail to ScudderfallsbridgeEAcomments@hntb.com or 1-800-879-0849.
Thanks for calling attention to this. I've been driving across the existing bridge for 13 years and always try to glance north or south to catch the view of the river. It's a beautiful spot. It's so nice to cross the Washington's Crossing Bridge and share the bridge with pedestrians and cyclists. It would be so refreshing to the same at car-friendly Scudders Falls. thephillyman
Of course it should have pedestrian lanes. Why on earth, though, does it need 9 lanes for traffic. Right now, the 4 lane bridge is more than adequate, considering that New Jersey (illegally) prevented the completion of I-95 to connect up with I-287 to protect its Turnpike from free competition. Thus, I-95 essentially goes to nowhere, although truckers take it and then NJ-31 to avoid the tolls. Unless we are going to court to force NJ to build the only section of I-95 that never was built, we don't need that costly or large a bridge. Palestra Jon
2 comments
- Brendan Calling
- City Howl
- City Paper's "The Clog"
- Commonwealth Confidential
- Daily Kos
- Heard in the Hall
- HuffPost
- Inquirer Editorial & Commentary
- Judges on Merit
- Metropolis
- The Pennsylvania Policy Blog
- Phawker
- Plan Philly
- phillyist
- philadelphia will do
- Philly Clout
- Philly Post
- Qewz: News in Perspective
- Trudy Rubin
- School Notebook
- Talking Points
- WHYY It's Our City
- Will Bunch/Attytood
- Young Philly Politics
- Dick Polman
- NewsWorks
Blog Roll
Get it now
- February
- January
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
Archives







