Thursday, July 2, 2015

N.J. Legislature has finally gone to the dogs

Have New Jersey’s nanny-staters finally run out of ways to overregulate the lives of people? The question has to be asked now that at least one state legislator has moved on to other mammals.

N.J. Legislature has finally gone to the dogs

0 comments
Scooter Robertson, a miniature poodle is securely harnessed. (Elizabeth Robertson / Staff Photographer)
Scooter Robertson, a miniature poodle is securely harnessed. (Elizabeth Robertson / Staff Photographer)

Have New Jersey’s nanny-staters finally run out of ways to overregulate the lives of people? The question has to be asked now that at least one state legislator has moved on to other mammals.

Assemblywoman Grace Spencer (D., Essex) has introduced the nation’s toughest seat-belt law — for dogs. With nothing even close to it in another state, Spencer’s bill threatens to catapult New Jersey into the vanguard of canine micro-legislation. And given all the pictures of them smoking and playing poker, one wonders if vice laws for dogs are far behind.

Saturday Night Live fans who remember the disastrous adventures of “Toonces the Driving Cat” needn’t worry: The bill also applies to “Felis catus or Felis domesticus” — whether they’re driving or not.

It will surprise few to learn that this bill was suggested by fourth graders. No, really: Spencer got the idea at a school in her Newark district — a place that, incidentally, offers plenty of policy challenges related to humans.

Meanwhile, proving the frivolous legislation multiplier effect, Assemblyman Jay Webber (R., Morris) — allegedly alarmed that transporting unharnessed pets can be construed as animal cruelty under current law — has floated a bill to clarify that it is not.

Luckily, Spencer’s dog may not hunt. State Sen. Raymond Lesniak (D., Union) told the Star-Ledger that his chamber has “bigger fish to fry” — presumably before his colleagues turn their attention to aquatic animal safety. It’s a reminder that lawmakers should show restraint before they mandate it.

0 comments
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy:

Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
 
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

The Inquirer Editorial Board's Say What? opinion blog showcases the work of the editors and writers who produce the newspaper's daily and Sunday opinion pages.

Find out more about The Inquirer's Editorial Board here.

The Inquirer Editorial Board
Also on Philly.com
letter icon Newsletter