PhillyTablet Inquirer Daily News
Mobile
Home Delivery
philly.com
email
font size
comments
0
options
 
Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Moon, Mars missions should be international
President Obama greeting (from left) Buzz Aldrin, Michael Collins, and Neil Armstrong at the White House on July 20, the 40th anniversary of the moon landing. (OLIVIER DOULIERY / Abaca Press)

 

Maybe someone should stick a copy of The Right Stuff into the DVD player Thursday night on President Obama’s long flight back from his mission to Asia.
 
That inspirational movie about America’s first astronauts might help Obama make a decision about the future of manned space flight. A blue-ribbon panel has told him that future will be bleak unless more money is spent.
 
In a recession, such an assessment would appear to be fatal. But some creative thinking might lead to a different conclusion.
 
With his mind on his whirlwind trip to Tokyo, Singapore, Shanghai, Beijing, and Seoul, Obama probably hasn’t had time to appreciate last week’s news that the presence of water on the moon has been confirmed. NASA purposely crashed two spacecraft into a crater at the moon’s south pole and kicked up debris that included ice and water vapor.
 
The discovery ironically came only months after former astronauts in the old Apollo program that first sent men to the moon 30 years ago had urged Obama to give up on plans to go back there and instead concentrate on a manned mission to Mars.
 
In fact, Buzz Aldrin, who walked on the moon in 1969 with Neil Armstrong, said the water discovery doesn’t justify going back. But in his zeal to get to Mars, he may be a bit myopic. Scientists say water on the moon makes it even more ideal as a low-gravity launching pad to deep-space points, including Mars.
 
But there’s the cost. Perhaps seeking a better legacy, President George W. Bush began a program to return U.S. astronauts to the moon and to land a man on Mars by 2020. He didn’t give NASA much more money, though. And while Obama lauded manned space flight on the campaign trail, he hasn’t made a corresponding financial commitment.
 
Obama said that decision would be guided by a committee of experts he appointed. That panel reported in September that NASA would need at least $3 billion added to its annual budget of nearly $19 billion to achieve Bush’s goals. It gave Obama other options, including extending the life of the space shuttle fleet, which is scheduled to be retired next year.
 
Of course, the shuttles can’t take you out to deep space. And they’re so old and patched-up that it’s risky to even keep sending them to the low-orbit International Space Station, which is itself scheduled to be shut down in 2015. The space station, however, does provide another model for Obama that he should consider.
 
Although largely a U.S. enterprise, the space station has been an international effort, with various nations providing components, crew, and scientists. If cost is the primary obstacle to moon and Mars missions that might provide scientific discoveries beneficial all mankind, then why shouldn’t that endeavor, like the space station, be international?
Posted by Inquirer Editorial Board @ 3:00 AM  Permalink | Post a comment
Comments   


0 comments
About The Inquirer Editorial Board
Welcome. You're reading the Inquirer Editorial Board's Say What? opinion blog. We hope you enjoy commentary from the Editorial and Commentary pages, in addition to up-to-the-minute opinion postings that appear here for the first time. Here are thumbnail bio sketches and contact information for the editors and writers who produce the newspaper's opinion pages, as well as an archive of recent cartoons by Tony Auth. (Our blog roll follows the ad below.) Please check out the videos from our One Great Idea project. And don't miss our daily online reader polls.
Join on Facebook    Follow on Twitter

Advertise Here