Monday, February 8, 2016

Make right choices in judicial races

With four capable candidates for judge on the state’s busiest appellate court, Pennsylvania voters can hardly go wrong on Nov. 8.

Make right choices in judicial races

Anne E. Covey
Anne E. Covey

With four capable candidates for judge on the state’s busiest appellate court, Pennsylvania voters can hardly go wrong on Nov. 8.

For Superior Court, which heard more than 8,400 criminal and civil appeals last year, a Pittsburgh judge, David N. Wecht, is squaring off against a Harrisburg attorney and former deputy attorney general, Victor P. Stabile.

Wecht, 49, has been an Allegheny County Common Pleas Court judge for more than eight years, formerly serving as the county’s elected register of wills. A Yale graduate, the Democratic nominee earned the Pennsylvania Bar Association’s “highly recommended” rating.  Stabile, 54, is managing partner for his law firm’s capital office, handling complex civil litigation. Stabile also served as a township supervisor for 10 years. The Republican nominee earned a “recommended” rating from the state bar.

While judicial experience doesn’t assure than an appellate court judge will excel in the job, it provides an edge in this contest. So, voters’ best choice for Superior Court is DAVID WECHT.

In the contest for Commonwealth Court between two Bucks County attorneys, the quasi-judicial experience of having served on the state’s labor relations board gives an advantage to Republican ANNE E. COVEY, 51.

Her Democratic opponent, legal-services and voting-rights attorney Kathryn Boockvar, 43, earned the state bar association’s praise as “bright, hardworking, and a zealous advocate.” But Covey, a corporate lawyer noted by the bar for her “administrative experience and judicial temperament,” would be able to hit the ground running on this court, which handles appeals of government, regulatory, labor law, and worker’s compensation.

For the Philadelphia courts, voters will be greeted by a bewildering number of candidates on the ballot — some seeking election for the first time, others seeking retention to another term. Given the city’s Democratic registration edge, the contested elections were all but decided in the primary. But in the retention elections, three judges have been rated “not recommended” by the Philadelphia Bar Association. “No” votes for James M. DeLeon of Municipal Court, and James M. Lynn and Robert J. Rebstock of Common Pleas Court, could help improve the quality of the city’s judiciary.

We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

The Inquirer Editorial Board's Say What? opinion blog showcases the work of the editors and writers who produce the newspaper's daily and Sunday opinion pages.

Find out more about The Inquirer's Editorial Board here.

The Inquirer Editorial Board
Also on
letter icon Newsletter