Tuesday, December 1, 2015

Libraries need e-books, too

Publishers and libraries are at odds over how to satisfy the public’s craving for electronic books. How they resolve this thorny issue will have a tremendous impact on readers.

Libraries need e-books, too


Publishers and libraries are at odds over how to satisfy the public’s craving for electronic books. How they resolve this thorny issue will have a tremendous impact on readers.

Fearing potentially crippling losses, publishers are withholding e-books from libraries, charging them more than other customers, or limiting how many times a library can lend an e-book. That bumps into librarians’ unwavering commitment to promote literacy, preserve culture, and make books available to people regardless of their financial situation.

E-books have become so popular that the Free Library of Philadelphia reports a surge from July 2011, when there were 17,000 downloads to last month, when there were 26,800 downloads.

Theoretically, e-books can last forever, and they are so easily obtained on the Internet that publishers believe they could lose their chance to recoup the costs of the original risks they took on authors and production. Paper books sold to libraries eventually deteriorate after many uses and libraries must replace them. With e-books, they don’t.

E-books a threat to public libraries?
Yes, licensing costs, loss of patron visits is a longterm worry
  159 (31.8%)
No, nothing can replace in-person browsing at the local library
  100 (20.0%)
Yes, publishers’ survival is threatened
  53 (10.6%)
No, libraries will find way to change with the times
  233 (46.6%)
Total votes = 500

The ease of downloading also means people don’t have to go to libraries for e-books, which raises questions about the future of libraries. They are more than just book warehouses. For example, the jobless go the library to hunt for employment on the Internet. Libraries help bridge the digital divide between those who have computers and those who don’t. Their programs for young children, teenagers, and adults promote literacy. And visits by popular authors to a public library are significant cultural events.

Librarians rightly argue that they are spending dwindling public resources on e-books, so they should get a break. Part of their job is to help build a literate society, which is essential to a strong democracy. They also make a strong case that libraries generate business for publishers.

“We know book borrowers are also book buyers, and we find that e-book borrowers are also e-book buyers, and that pattern won’t change,” says Sari Feldman, cochair of the American Library Association’s e-book committee.

But publishers have a point, too, in wanting to protect their businesses and authors from losses. Unlike newspapers, which went to the Internet without a sustainable business model, book publishers are trying to figure out a way to protect themselves before leaping into cyberspace.

A compromise that could work is being pioneered by Harper Collins, which put a 26-loan cap on its e-books last year. Once an e-book is borrowed 26 times, a library must buy a new license. But Harper’s limited-use model doesn’t assist librarians in their roles as preservers of the culture. Imagine how scandalous it would be if the Free Library’s impressive collection of first-edition Charles Dickens’ novels were e-books with expired licenses?

Fortunately, both sides are continuing to discuss their linked fates. They met last week at the Public Library Association conference in Philadelphia.

The solution has to balance the health of the publishing industry with the public’s thirst for knowledge — and a library’s ability to cultivate that thirst.

We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy:

Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

The Inquirer Editorial Board's Say What? opinion blog showcases the work of the editors and writers who produce the newspaper's daily and Sunday opinion pages.

Find out more about The Inquirer's Editorial Board here.

The Inquirer Editorial Board
Also on Philly.com
letter icon Newsletter