Sunday, November 29, 2015

Housing chief has some explaining to do

It has been a rough 10 days for Carl Greene, the head of the Philadelphia Housing Authority.

Housing chief has some explaining to do

Carl R. Greene, executive director of the Philadelphia Housing Authority, retreated to his condo, not taking calls from friends and colleagues.
Carl R. Greene, executive director of the Philadelphia Housing Authority, retreated to his condo, not taking calls from friends and colleagues.


It has been a rough 10 days for Carl Greene, the head of the Philadelphia Housing Authority. Lots of troubling allegations have been leveled against him, including claims of sexual harassment and harsh treatment of employees. Greene didn’t help his defense by not coming to work and essentially going into hiding. That has allowed even more rumors and allegations to fill the vacuum. But before there is a rush to judgment, Greene deserves a chance to defend himself against any and all allegations. He hasn’t been charged with any crimes.
How the issues surrounding Greene play out will have a big impact on Philadelphia. He oversees a $345 million-a-year agency with 1,150 employees. PHA is the city’s biggest landlord, housing 81,000 poor residents. The agency has a long history of waste, fraud, and abuse. But under Greene, who was hired in 1999, PHA has been considered a major success. Over the past decade, PHA has knocked down high-rises that were magnets for drug-dealing and other crime, and replaced them with attractive townhouses that have improved the quality of life for those in public housing and the surrounding neighborhoods. Frequent complaints about Section 8 housing have largely disappeared.
In 2008, Greene was lauded for standing up to pressure from the head of the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development to turn over $2 million in property to a politically connected property developer. But a torrent of bad news for Greene began with the disclosure a little more than a week ago that his $615,000 townhouse was in foreclosure. That didn’t make any sense, given Greene’s generous salary of $306,000 a year.  That embarrassing revelation was followed by the disclosure that the Internal Revenue Service filed a $52,000 lien in December against Greene for income over four years labeled “small business/self employed.”
In an interview with the Editorial Board on Friday, Greene said that he has been too focused on doing his job at the expense of managing his personal finances. He said he ignored the bills, and likened it to having a toothache and avoiding the dentist. “I have no credible or rational reason for it,” he said. Agreed. But at the same time, there is no evidence to date that the financial issues have impacted his job performance. Greene has since brought his brought mortgage up to date and is working with the IRS on the lien.
More troubling are the six complaints filed by women against Greene since 2004 with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, alleging sexual harassment, verbal abuse, retaliation, and sex discrimination. Greene denies the allegations. He told the Editorial Board he isn’t perfect, and is “humiliated, embarrassed, contrite and saddened by his personal failings.” It is unclear where this story will go. At this point, the PHA board and Mayor Nutter need to review all of the allegations and give Greene a chance to respond. But before there is a rush to judgment, let’s get all the facts from all sides, and see where the truth leads.
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

The Inquirer Editorial Board's Say What? opinion blog showcases the work of the editors and writers who produce the newspaper's daily and Sunday opinion pages.

Find out more about The Inquirer's Editorial Board here.

The Inquirer Editorial Board
Also on
letter icon Newsletter