Tuesday, August 4, 2015

Harrisburg waste du jour

Today our blog offers the first installment of examples of waste in the General Assembly, as highlighted by the 28th Statewide Investigating Grand Jury. We'll keep them coming daily until it no longer amuses us, or until we burst a capillary.

Harrisburg waste du jour

0 comments
Bill DeWeese is charged with using state-paid legislative staff to do campaign work.
Bill DeWeese is charged with using state-paid legislative staff to do campaign work. AP

Today our blog offers the first installment of examples of waste in the General Assembly, as highlighted by the 28th Statewide Investigating Grand Jury. We'll keep them coming daily until it no longer amuses us, or until we burst a capillary.

Waste #1: A part-time legislature at full-time prices.

Pennsylvania's legislators are among the highest-paid state lawmakers in the nation, with rank-and-file members being paid $78,314 annually (excluding benefits and other perks, such as per diem expenses). Those in party leadership receive higher salaries; the Speaker of the House is paid $122,254.

The legislature is considered full-time, yet many legislators hold other jobs, and the House was in session an average of only 101 days per year over the past four years. While the grand jury acknowledged that some work gets done when the legislature is not officially in session, "these numbers do not appear to justify full-time status."

Even days spent in session are sometimes, shockingly, pointless. The grand jury found that legislators occasionally would debate a bill that had already passed, for lack of anything better to do. "This procedure was clearly designed to give the appearance of working, when in reality no legitimate work was being done."

Further proof that the legislature is really part-time: the abundance of taxpayer-paid staffers who were assigned to perform campaign work during regular business hours, the subject of the grand jury's investigation in the first place.

Less than one dozen states have truly full-time legislatures. If Pennsylvania returned to part-time status, with corresponding salary cuts, the grand jury found it would save more than $10 million annually in salaries alone.

 

0 comments
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy:

Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
 
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

The Inquirer Editorial Board's Say What? opinion blog showcases the work of the editors and writers who produce the newspaper's daily and Sunday opinion pages.

Find out more about The Inquirer's Editorial Board here.

The Inquirer Editorial Board
Also on Philly.com
letter icon Newsletter