Sunday, February 7, 2016

Fighting back against voter-ID rules

Bravo for the voters scattered around Philadelphia who noted the test run of new photo-identification rules by engaging in what might be called “one man, one protest” tactics.

Fighting back against voter-ID rules


Bravo for the voters scattered around Philadelphia who noted the test run of new photo-identification rules by engaging in what might be called “one man, one protest” tactics.

Or one woman, as in the case of the 80-something voter who proudly informed election workers at her Upper Roxborough polling place Tuesday that she left her ID at home on purpose.

Those voters who refused to produce identification were standing up against the state’s unprecedented requirement that citizens must provide government-issued identification before their votes can be counted.

Look for that spirit of defiance to spread to other Pennsylvania voters in November, when the identity checks become mandatory amid the crush at the polls in a busy presidential election.

Pa. voters, how was your experience with the test run of the new voter-ID rules?
Government-issued ID wasn't mandatory to vote in Pa. Tuesday, but it will be on Nov. 6th.
Wasn’t even asked for ID, but had my driver’s license
First time I had heard about the new rules
ID was requested, and I showed it
Refused to show ID as a protest

While state officials declared the primary a good trial for the as-yet advisory rules, the experience with regular voters in a low-turnout election hardly predicts the fall. To be sure, Secretary of the Commonwealth Carol Aichele would have encountered plenty of voters without a driver’s license had she visited polling places in North Philadelphia, rather than the car-dependent Northeast.

Republican legislative leaders and Gov. Corbett have promoted the voter-ID law as a tool to thwart fraud, but there’s no evidence of fraud at a scale that would warrant such a draconian response.

The actual impact — and likely driving force behind the GOP’s national push for such laws — will be to disenfranchise Democratic-leaning minority, elderly, and first-time voters in what can only be described as a cynical bid to rig elections.

While a state House bill by city lawmakers would repeal the rules, the better hope is that rights advocates are able to scuttle voter ID with a legal challenge before the polls open on Nov. 6.

We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

The Inquirer Editorial Board's Say What? opinion blog showcases the work of the editors and writers who produce the newspaper's daily and Sunday opinion pages.

Find out more about The Inquirer's Editorial Board here.

The Inquirer Editorial Board
Also on
letter icon Newsletter