Sunday, February 14, 2016

Crucial but likely doomed peace talks

JERUSALEM - On the Mamilla Mall, on a balmy fall evening, a group of Israelis and tourists swayed to the piped-in beat of a passe doble, dancing on an open air walkway lined with chic shops selling jewelry and clothing.

Crucial but likely doomed peace talks

0 comments

JERUSALEM — On the Mamilla Mall, on a balmy fall evening, a group of Israelis and tourists swayed to the piped-in beat of a passe doble, dancing on an open air walkway lined with chic shops selling jewelry and clothing.


Families with strollers watched, young people flirted, intellectuals perused books in nearby Steinmatsky’s or sipped cappuccino in Café Café. Yet a five minutes walk away stood the Jaffa Gate entrance to the hotly contested Old City, and 10 minutes distant were the East Jerusalem neighborhoods that Palestinians want for their capital. The towns of the occupied West Bank, once 20 minutes by car but now fenced off by the “separation wall,” might as well have been on another planet.


Can this Israeli status quo last if peace talks with the Palestinians end?
 

In the short term yes. In the medium-term I doubt it. And I believe the long-term consequences to Israel, the region, and the West will be enormous. So let me offer five reasons why the success of Israel-Palestine talks is crucial — and five reasons why they will probably fail.
 

1. Demography. If Israel keeps control of the West Bank and Gaza, Arabs will eventually comprise the majority of the population living in Greater Israel, the land between the Jordan River and the Mediterannean. Then Jerusalem will have to choose: Will it remain a democracy and give the Arab majority full citizenship, thus losing its Jewish character, or will it keep the bulk of the Palestinians disenfranchised. Either way, a one-state solution guarantees endless civil war.
 

2. Again Demography. The occupation of the West Bank and Gaza fuels discontent among Palestinian Arab citizens of Israel, who make up 20 percent of the population. Islamists are making headway among young Israeli Arabs already alienated by discrimination. In the past week, Israel’s parliament demanded loyalty oaths, and enabled small Jewish villages to bar Arabs. This problem is bound to grow.
 

3. No more peace process, no more moderate Palestinian leaders. As talks falter, support for Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and the Fatah movement plummets and Islamist Hamas hopes to pick up the slack. Already, the Palestinian public labels the security forces of Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad as collaborators for helping Israel fight Hamas on the West Bank. How long before those forces collapse if peace talks fail?
 

4. A dying peace process will accelerate the end of the old Arab order. Moderate Arab leaders want a peace deal in order to isolate Iran and counter Islamists in the region. They back a 2002 Arab peace initiative that calls for all Arab states to recognize Israel once a Palestinian state is established. But Egypt’s President Hosni Mubarak and Saudi King Abdullah are aging; once they die that Arab consensus on accepting Israel will vanish.
 

5. American influence in the region is waning, and Iran’s is rising. The death of the peace process, in which President Obama invested so much, will accelerate both trends.
 

Yet, despite all of the above, a week here convinces me that the peace talks will go nowhere. Why so?
 

1. Many Israelis do believe the status quo can last. This is easy to understand when driving around the West Bank, where Jewish settlements sprawl across the hilltops, with a permanent, fortress-like appearance. Suicide bombers no longer blow up Israeli buses and cafes. Israel’s economy is doing well, and most of its citizens can ignore what goes on behind the separation fence. So why risk a peace?
 

2. After 17 years of failed talks, and rockets from Gaza, Israelis don’t believe peace is possible, and have moved rightward. This week marks the 15th anniversary of the assassination of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin by a Jewish terrorist opposed to the Oslo peace process, but yesterday’s annual memorial ceremony will be the last because attendance is dropping. A recent cartoon in the Israeli press showed a workman taking down signs for the memorial and saying “Next year the demonstration will be for Yigal Amir” — the man who shot Rabin.
 

3. After 17 years of settlement expansion, Palestinians no longer believe, either. Their leadership is weak and divided. And they are too busy with the travails of life under occupation — like the two hours it can take to get through the Kalandia checkpoint between Jerusalem and the West Bank town of Ramallah — to think about an unlikely peace.
 

4. The gap between the two sides on key issues that once seemed bridgeable has grown impassable. Example: Israel leaders now insist on keeping all of Jerusalem, while Palestinians leaders, under growing pressure from Islamists, say they must control the holy sites.
 

5. America’s influence in the region is waning, while Iran’s is rising. Some Israelis think it’s necessary to hit Iran first, and then the Palestinians will fall in line. This reminds me of the belief in the Bush White House that the road to Jerusalem peace ran through Baghdad.
 

If the peace process tanks, those who will cheer the loudest are Tehran and its allies, Hezbollah and Hamas, who will feed off this failure. The dancing will continue for now at Mamilla Mall, but the tears will come later, I fear.
 

E-mail Trudy Rubin at trubin@phillynews.com.
 

0 comments
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy:

Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
 
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

The Inquirer Editorial Board's Say What? opinion blog showcases the work of the editors and writers who produce the newspaper's daily and Sunday opinion pages.

Find out more about The Inquirer's Editorial Board here.

The Inquirer Editorial Board
Also on Philly.com
letter icon Newsletter