PhillyTablet Inquirer Daily News
philly.com
email
font size
options
 
Monday, February 13, 2012
Gov. Corbett's budget calls for cuts in welfare spending.

Right to cut off minimal cash grants to Pa. needy?
No, saves peanuts but $200 a month helps individuals
Yes, with such small grants, cuts shouldn’t matter
No, will push up other government costs with homelessness, crime
Yes, but should be restored when economy improves

There is plenty not to like in Gov. Corbett’s proposed $27.1 billion budget plan, but his disregard for the state’s most needy tops the list. Children would lose Medicaid benefits and thousands of adults would be tossed off General Assistance rolls, including the disabled, recovering drug addicts, and battered women.

For the second year, Corbett held firm on his pledge to avoid tax increases by making drastic cuts to balance the budget. His proposed “lean and demanding” budget targets two of the costliest state departments — education and public welfare. Corbett’s efforts to be fiscally responsible are commendable. He has difficult choices to make. But his priorities when it comes to where to cut are downright disturbing.

By targeting the poor, he risks exacerbating conditions rooted in poverty that in the long run will end up costing the state even more money to correct.

Corbett proposes eliminating the $300 million General Assistance program, which provides only a subsistence benefit to the most vulnerable residents, roughly $180 a month in most counties. About 60,000 Pennsylvanians receive this assistance, which serves as a lifeline for the very poor who are temporarily disabled, victims of domestic violence, or caring for an elderly parent.

The governor says he wants to “right-size” welfare, and he suggests that the system has been abused by people who should be steered from the public coffers. But there is no evidence of the General Assistance program’s being misused. Even with more people out of work due to the economy, less than 0.5 percent of Pennsylvanians receive General Assistance dollars. Eliminating the safety net will save an estimated $150 million annually. But the cuts will likely send the poor to already overwhelmed churches, shelters, and community agencies struggling to meet growing demands.

Pages: 1  |  2
Posted by Inquirer Editorial Board @ 3:05 AM  Permalink | Post a comment
Comments   


0 comments
About The Inquirer Editorial Board
Welcome. You're reading the Inquirer Editorial Board's Say What? opinion blog. We hope you enjoy commentary from the Editorial and Commentary pages, in addition to up-to-the-minute opinion postings that appear here for the first time. Here are thumbnail bio sketches and contact information for the editors and writers who produce the newspaper's opinion pages. (Our blog roll follows the ad below.) Please check out the videos from our One Great Idea project. And don't miss our daily online reader polls.
Join on Facebook    Follow on Twitter