Tuesday, September 1, 2015

Chalk up charges to overzealous policing

The unsubstantiated “gateway drug” theory has been used to justify draconian measures against marijuana use on the grounds that it leads inexorably to hard-core drug addiction. Now authorities in Doylestown have brought us a new but related concept: the gateway doodle.

Chalk up charges to overzealous policing

0 comments

The unsubstantiated “gateway drug” theory has been used to justify draconian measures against marijuana use on the grounds that it leads inexorably to hard-core drug addiction. Now authorities in Doylestown have brought us a new but related concept: the gateway doodle.

Doylestown police recently cited two local teenagers for chalk drawings on a borough street, apparently on the hypothesis that such activities begin a slippery slope toward spray-painting railcars with gang signs.

Police Chief James Donnelly told the Doylestown Intelligencer that even though the drawings in question innocently depicted a whale and sea turtles, they could be related to more obscene chalk drawings perpetrated about town. (He later said they weren’t.) Moreover, he added, such conduct could lead to vandalism with more indelible materials. And so we got a rare case in which a chalk outline didn’t just delineate the crime; it was the crime.

To their credit — after far-flung media attention and the appearance of “Chalk Watch” flyers lampooning the crackdown on “suspicious chalk-drawing” — the police came to their senses. Last week, Donnelly said they had dropped criminal mischief charges against the two boys, ages 17 and 18, because the statute applies only to more durable media.

Indeed, the case did present serious evidentiary challenges: A few days after the citations, the Intelligencer noted that the drawings had already been “washed away by rain.”

While the Doylestown authorities eventually corrected their mistake, the incident suggests that they suffer either from overstaffing or inefficiency — as well as some unwarranted hostility toward harmless young people. Those impressions may linger longer than the chalk.

0 comments
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy:

Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
 
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

The Inquirer Editorial Board's Say What? opinion blog showcases the work of the editors and writers who produce the newspaper's daily and Sunday opinion pages.

Find out more about The Inquirer's Editorial Board here.

The Inquirer Editorial Board
Also on Philly.com
letter icon Newsletter