PhillyTablet Inquirer Daily News
Mobile
Home Delivery
philly.com
email
font size
comments
1
options
 
Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Boy-in-balloon hoax sends reality-TV message
Falcon Heene, 6, is carried by his father, Richard, as they emerged from the family's Colorado home Thursday. (DAVID ZALUBOWSKI / Associated Press)

The hoax about a boy carried off in a weather balloon shows what happens to some parents when the fame and cash of “reality” TV beckon.

Much of the nation’s attention was riveted last week by news coverage of the flying-saucer- shaped balloon soaring high above the Colorado landscape. The family of Falcon Heene, 6, told authorities the boy might be aboard the wayward aircraft.
 
National Guard rescue helicopters were scrambled at a cost of thousands of dollars. Denver International Airport was closed briefly. When the balloon was retrieved without the boy, law enforcement officials searched for his body along the flight path, fearing he had fallen out.
 
As the nation now knows, little Falcon is safe. He was never on the balloon. A local sheriff now says the episode was a publicity stunt, and that parents Richard and Mayumi Heene face felony criminal charges.
 
The husband and wife had appeared previously on the Wife Swap reality show, and the sheriff said the balloon stunt was concocted to land another reality TV deal. If so, perhaps the couple should ink a deal about real opportunists who go to a real jail.
 
If the Heenes were trying to exploit their children for financial gain, they will need to answer in court for it. But the sad truth is that their notoriety still could enhance their marketability someday in the increasingly deceptive world of “reality” TV.
 
These television shows are all the rage because they’re relatively cheap to produce and they feed the public’s illusion that everyone can be a “star.” But audiences need to start asking themselves more often whether they are being hustled, and whether children are being put through an emotional wringer for the sake of ratings.
 
For example, what is “real” about a show featuring a young couple struggling to raise eight kids in Pennsylvania (Jon & Kate Plus Eight), while they’re being paid $75,000 per episode? But the recent breakup of the self-absorbed parents is all too real.
 
These shows wouldn’t exist without the audience demand for them. And so a fellow like Richard Heene — storm chaser, nutty professor, and wanna-be TV star — will even risk putting his family through turmoil stressful enough to cause his son to vomit on live television.
 
Judgment-impaired parents sometimes make the reprehensible decision to exploit their own children for 15 minutes of fame. But the growing reality-TV market bears some responsibility for encouraging them.
Posted by Inquirer Editorial Board @ 4:00 AM  Permalink | 1 comment
Comments   
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:42 PM, 10/20/2009
    When I heard this was a hoax I immediately thought of 12 Monkeys.
    — towman


1 comments
About The Inquirer Editorial Board
Welcome. You're reading the Inquirer Editorial Board's Say What? opinion blog. We hope you enjoy commentary from the Editorial and Commentary pages, in addition to up-to-the-minute opinion postings that appear here for the first time. Here are thumbnail bio sketches and contact information for the editors and writers who produce the newspaper's opinion pages, as well as an archive of recent cartoons by Tony Auth. (Our blog roll follows the ad below.) Please check out the videos from our One Great Idea project. And don't miss our daily online reader polls.
Join on Facebook    Follow on Twitter

Advertise Here