Sunday, November 29, 2015

Assange extradition not about freedom of speech

As much as Julian Assange would like the world to think his plight is all about freedom of speech, it isn’t.

Assange extradition not about freedom of speech


As much as Julian Assange would like the world to think his plight is all about freedom of speech, it isn’t.

It’s not about taking sides on how WikiLeaks has been disclosing the contents of secret documents. That’s important. But it doesn’t mean Assange should be allowed to manipulate the issue to avoid facing rape charges.

The founder of WikiLeaks has been holed up in Ecuador’s embassy in London, trying to avoid extradition to Sweden now that the British courts have ruled he should face accusations of rape and sexual molestation there.

Assange claims the charges were trumped up as part of a conspiracy to ultimately have him prosecuted in the United States for leaking classified government documents. He apparently has a believer in Ecuadoran President Rafael Correa, who has granted him asylum, and others.

Should the British extradite Julian Assange to Sweden to face sexual-assault charges?
Yes, Sweden has a deserved reputation for fair trials
No, once extradited, the U.S. will try to get him for spying
Yes, accusations of rape are too serious to be ignored
No, the charges are a ruse to shut down WikiLeaks

Recently, standing on a balcony of Ecuador’s London embassy, Assange called on President Obama to “do the right thing.” His supporters cheered fervently as Assange asserted, “The United States must renounce its witch hunt against WikiLeaks.”

It was good theater, but his remarks did nothing to change the fact that two women have accused him of sexual assault. He says he is innocent, so prove it in court. It’s not as if he faces extradition to some country where the rule of law is a foreign concept.

Sweden is a well-respected democracy known to treat defendants fairly. Everyone is equal under the law. It is not a country with a reputation of ignoring its own judicial system to appease the United States or any other nation.

In fact, even if the United States does decide to seek to try Assange, Sweden, as a signer of the European Union’s Charter of Fundamental Rights, is forbidden to extradite anyone to a country where he might face the death penalty. Espionage is a capital offense in the United States.

Correa should stop protecting Assange. Indeed, if he is so concerned about freedom of speech, he should try granting it to the people of Ecuador. Assange should be tried in Sweden.

We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

The Inquirer Editorial Board's Say What? opinion blog showcases the work of the editors and writers who produce the newspaper's daily and Sunday opinion pages.

Find out more about The Inquirer's Editorial Board here.

The Inquirer Editorial Board
Also on
letter icon Newsletter