New Jersey voters should approve a $400 million bond referendum on Nov. 3 to help preserve open space in the densely populated state.
Without a desperately needed infusion of cash, land conservation projects already in progress, as well as new projects to save farmland and historic areas, could be in jeopardy.
The Garden State Preservation Trust has nearly exhausted all of its funding from previous bond measures that allowed New Jersey to protect thousands of acres from development and preserve pristine water supplies.
By authorizing the state to borrow money to buy property, voters can help save what is widely regarded as one of the most successful and largest land preservation programs in the country.
Since 1985, the state has preserved 1.2 millions acres of open space, including 430,928 acres in state parks, 11 state forests, three recreation sites, 42 natural areas, six marinas, and more than 50 historic sites and 324,366 acres in 120 wildlife management areas, plus 176,435 acres of farmland.
Despite those efforts, studies predict New Jersey within 25 years could become the first state to reach the “build out” stage. The New Jersey Conservation Foundation, howwever, says there’s still about 2 million acres that can be saved.
Critics say the state should not take on any more debt, given its current fiscal predicament. They want a dedicated funding source for land acquisition. That would be ideal, but it may not be feasible until the economy improves and state revenues pick up.
For now, another bond issue provides the best solution — and it’s one that New Jerseyans have agreed with in the past. Since 1961, voters have approved 12 consecutive statewide land preservation measures.
With real estate prices at record lows, the timing is perfect for New Jersey to purchase and preserve more open space for the next generation. The trust stretches taxpayer money by matching the funds provided by the 21 counties and municipalities with local open-space initiatives.
If approved, the $400 million bond referendum would cost each household an average of $10 a year. That’s not too high a price to preserve open space. New Jerseyans should vote YES.
- Brendan Calling
- City Howl
- City Paper's "The Clog"
- Commonwealth Confidential
- Daily Kos
- Heard in the Hall
- HuffPost
- Inquirer Editorial & Commentary
- Judges on Merit
- Metropolis
- The Pennsylvania Policy Blog
- Phawker
- Plan Philly
- phillyist
- philadelphia will do
- Philly Clout
- Philly Post
- Qewz: News in Perspective
- Trudy Rubin
- School Notebook
- Talking Points
- WHYY It's Our City
- Will Bunch/Attytood
- Young Philly Politics
- Dick Polman
- NewsWorks
- February
- January
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009







