Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Archive: November, 2009

TEXT SIZE: A A A A
Monday, November 23, 2009
Governor-elect Christopher J. Christie will have a lot on his plate with New Jersey's economic problems. (ELIZABETH ROBERTSON / Staff Photographer)

 

In any review of the nation’s worst public-policy practices, New Jersey can usually expect a prominent mention — so much so that residents could be forgiven for ignoring such dubious honors.
 
But the latest example, in a report by the Pew Center on the States, makes some illuminating points about the Garden State’s fiscal quagmire.
 
The report, “Beyond California: States in Fiscal Peril,” measures others against the Golden State as the gold standard for fiscal apocalypse. While California is “in a league of its own,” Pew ranked nine other states as playing at the triple-A level — just shy of the big leagues of budgetary disaster. It shouldn’t surprise anyone who’s been paying attention that New Jersey is among them.
 
All that passes for a bright side is that seven states were judged to be worse. Of course, that means 42 are looking better. (Pennsylvania was ranked among those farthest from California-style calamity.)
 
New Jersey’s weaknesses are troubling in that they have relatively little to do with the recession. Rather, decades of bad management of state finances are mostly to blame. The report quotes the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities’ Jon Shure, a longtime Trenton watcher, comparing the recession in New Jersey to “a tornado hitting a house that was already falling.”
 
Some of the states profiled have taken the recession’s hardest punches — soaring foreclosure rates in California and Florida, for example, or Michigan’s auto industry collapse. But New Jersey’s foreclosure rate and its rise in joblessness have been less severe than the nation’s.
 
The state did suffer disproportionately from Wall Street’s contraction, but financial industry woes weren’t enough to put New York or Connecticut on the list. Unlike the troubled states in the West and Midwest, New Jersey isn’t part of any regional cluster of concern.
 
Its problem, as Pew notes, is a structural imbalance between what it spends and what it collects. And there’s little room to raise more revenue: Taxes on property, income, businesses, and sales are all at or near the national ceiling.
 
Instead of fixing the imbalance, politicians from both parties have engaged in irresponsible borrowing for years, contributing to a per capita debt that’s almost unmatched nationwide. Paying the interest puts still further pressure on the budget.
 
If you’re a governor-elect named Chris, it might be particularly dispiriting to learn that Gov. Corzine has taken many difficult steps toward righting the state’s finances — and yet “barely made a dent,” Pew says. Corzine performed the remarkable feat of reducing state spending, eliminated fiscal gimmicks, limited borrowing, and pushed unsuccessfully to retire state debt with highway toll increases.
 
Probably the most tangible immediate result of all this was Chris Christie’s victory earlier this month. In some ways, Christie is well positioned to meet these daunting challenges. He was elected on vague promises to bring upheaval to Trenton, and that gives him considerable leeway to do so. He will need it.
Posted by Inquirer Editorial Board @ 4:00 AM  Permalink | Post a comment
Monday, November 23, 2009
Gary Kao, the University of Pennsylvania radiation oncologist who directed the prostate program, appearingat a Senate hearing in June. At right is Gerald Cross of the Veterans Health Administration. (APRIL SAUL / Staff Photographer)

 

The slow reaction by the Department of Veterans Affairs to a flawed cancer-treatment program in Philadelphia suggests an agency that would rather forget its mistakes than learn from them.
 
Problems in treating nearly 100 veterans with prostate cancer began with the earliest cases, in 2002, The Inquirer has reported. But seven years later, and more than a year after this newspaper uncovered the substandard care, the VA and other institutions involved in the program have done little to hold anyone accountable.
 
The University of Pennsylvania doctor who performed most of the faulty procedures, Gary Kao, lost his job when the Philadelphia VA Medical Center shut down the program in June 2008. He’s on leave from his research position at Penn. Another doctor agreed to a three-day suspension.
 
And that’s about it for penalties to date. It’s a disappointing statement about the absence of oversight and responsibility by the VA, the university, and others.
A total of 98 veterans with prostate cancer were treated in the program, using a procedure called brachytherapy. The treatment involves placing radioactive seeds in the prostate gland to kill cancerous cells.
 
The procedure works well when done correctly. But veterans treated at the Philadelphia VA received incorrect doses of radiation, often because the seeds were implanted in the wrong locations.
 
Eight veterans have been sent to Seattle for further treatment, and at least five patients have filed claims with the VA. More are expected.
 
It’s bad enough to give substandard medical care to people who sacrificed for their country. But the injury is compounded by the apparent reluctance of various agencies to face up to the episode and to ensure that similar problems don’t happen again.
 
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which oversees the medical use of radiation, has reached disturbing conclusions in a report on the program. It said the Philadelphia VA staff didn’t know when to report mistakes. And the cancer-treatment team didn’t even check radiation doses for more than a year because a computer wasn’t working.
 
The VA’s own review of the program contained errors, the NRC said. And the VA didn’t compile a complete list of the overdoses and underdoses of radiation until last month.
 
The NRC will hold a public meeting Dec. 17 to decide what, if any, action to take against the VA Medical Center. The possible penalties range from a reprimand to stiff fines. The Department of Veterans Affairs’ inspector general is conducting a separate investigation.
 
Veterans and the taxpaying public deserve a full accounting of how these mistakes in the program occurred, why it took so long for the problems to come to light, and who wasn’t doing his job.
 
The Department of Veterans Affairs also needs to explain how it intends to ensure better safeguards for its medical care going forward.
Posted by Inquirer Editorial Board @ 2:00 AM  Permalink | Post a comment
Sunday, November 22, 2009
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nev. smiles during a health care reform news conference, Thursday, November 19, 2009, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Lauren Victoria Burke)

One by one, the obstacles to a once-unimaginable overhaul of the nation’s $2.5 trillion health care system are tumbling by the wayside.


The Senate’s deliberation this weekend over its prescription for expanding health insurance coverage to most Americans represents, as President Obama noted, another milestone on the road to health-care reform.
 

Despite the entrenched and increasingly shrill opposition from congressional Republicans to any and all comprehensive reform, there is growing reason to hold out hope for success.
 

In predicting on behalf of the GOP that the coming Senate debate will be “a holy war,” veteran Sen. Orrin G. Hatch (R., Utah) appears to ignore what most Americans understand about the critical need for reform.
 

Posted by Inquirer editorial board @ 2:05 AM  Permalink | 2 comments
Sunday, November 22, 2009
Gov. Rendell wants to clean up Harrisburg.

In the wake of another round of indictments alleging corruption in the legislature, Harrisburg is again embracing “reform.”


House Minority Leader Sam Smith (R., Jefferson), whose name appeared frequently in the grand jury’s report despite not being charged, proposed an “ethics officer” to field complaints of misconduct. He also wants rules to bar staffers from campaigning on state time, or using government equipment for campaign work.
Both practices already are illegal — hence the heavy workload of Attorney General Tom Corbett these past two years.
 

Smith sounded very much like former Democratic House leader Bill DeWeese (D., Unindicted) did 16 months ago. He professed shock and surprise that close colleagues in his party’s leadership, including former Speaker John M. Perzel (R., Phila.), allegedly spent public money illegally on political campaigns right under his nose.
 

There’s nothing wrong with Smith’s proposal for corrective action, except it doesn’t go far enough. The culture in Harrisburg of blurring the political and the legislative is too pervasive to be changed by new caucus rules, which could expire later. Smith rightly wants to bar government contractors from making campaign donations, but doesn’t touch needed donor limits.
 

Posted by Inquirer editorial board @ 2:00 AM  Permalink | Post a comment
Saturday, November 21, 2009
In this image from video, Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., speaks on the Senate floor Wednesday, Nov. 18, 2009, at the Capitol in Washington. Wednesday marked the day when Byrd became the longest-serving member of Congress. (AP Photo/APTV)

Whatever else you might think of him, Sen. Robert Byrd (D., W.<TH>Va.) reached an impressive milestone on Wednesday.


The adopted son of a coal miner became the longest-serving lawmaker ever in the history of Congress: 56 years and 319 days.
 

Byrd, who is in poor health and turned 92 yesterday, is in his ninth term in the Senate. He has served under 11 presidents, beginning with President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1953.


The record for congressional longevity had belonged to Carl Hayden of Arizona, who served nearly 57 years in the House and Senate from 1912 to 1969. Three years ago, Byrd surpassed the late Sen. Strom Thurmond of South Carolina as the longest-serving senator.
 

Posted by Inquirer editorial board @ 2:00 AM  Permalink | 2 comments
Friday, November 20, 2009
AS THE setting sun creates a scarlet and golden reflective glow on the Schuylkill, tired rowers hoist their shell over their heads and turn toward their boathouse ... or, maybe they're just headed east to Jersey, getting an early head start on practice for the errant Dad Vail regatta.

The 75-year-old Dad Vail Regatta hasn’t always been held in Philadelphia, but since 1953, the Schuylkill has been its home and that’s where it belongs.


Unfortunately, next May the Dad Vail crews will be rowing their boats down the Navesink in North Jersey. That’s where the tony New York suburb of Rumson outbid Philadelphia to host the races. Except the event wasn’t actually put up for bids. Rumson instead waved $250,000 under the noses of the Dad Vail’s organizers and they grabbed it. Philadelphia officials say they didn’t hear about the deal until it was done.
 

The Dad Vail folks certainly had no reason to believe this city would come up with similar cash, given its five-year doubling of fees charged for police, fire, and other services during the event. But would it have hurt to ask?
Rumson Mayor John E. Ekdahl said his town pounced on the opportunity to sponsor the nation’s largest college regatta, and expects big returns in what will be spent at local hotels, restaurants, and stores. Every dollar spent in the Monmouth County town will be a buck Philadelphia misses.
 

But the Rumson deal is only for next year, so Philadelphia can try to bring it back home. To do that, though, a 60 percent drop in corporate sponsorship that the regatta experienced for this year’s race needs to be made up.
The recession has hit local companies hard, but, as the people in Rumson point out, investing in the Dad Vail Regatta brings economic returns that benefit businesses that support the event. Corporate citizens need to step up. And city officials need to reconsider what to charge the race for services.
 

The Dad Vail Regatta has been held here so long that many people probably think its name refers to a local hero. Actually, Harry Emerson “Dad” Vail was a University of Wisconsin crew coach well known for getting his boys to dig deeper when facing adversity. Bringing the race back is a challenge that this city can win.

Posted by Inquirer editorial board @ 2:00 AM  Permalink | 1 comment
Friday, November 20, 2009
A federal panel is recommending a radical change to mammogram guidelines, citing evidence that the potential harm outweighs the benefits. (Heather Charles/MCT/File)

The aim of medicine is above all else, to do no harm. But one must wonder if that will be the case with a new medical recommendation on the detection of breast cancer.


For years, experts widely agreed that mammograms beginning at age 40 provided the best way for early detection of breast cancer. But new guidelines released this week by an important federal task force recommend a drastic change and raise new questions about the benefits of testing and exams.


The panel says women don’t need mammograms until they’re 50 and then only every other year, not annually. The potential harm of annual testing outweighs the benefits, the panel found. It was the first breast-cancer reassessment since 2002 by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, which typically guides federal policy.
 

The guidelines could have a far-reaching impact in the national debate over health-care reform. About 39 million women undergo mammograms each year in the United States. Critics worry that the policy shift could be a major setback for health, if insurers eventually scale back mammogram coverage for women in their 40s.
 

Posted by Inquirer editorial board @ 2:00 AM  Permalink | 4 comments
Thursday, November 19, 2009
Plans to widen Route 322 will put a five-lane road within feet of Marlene and Dewey Gray's front stoop in Richwood, Gloucester County. (April Saul / Staff Photographer)

 

Imagine living in a home for 40 years, and one day waking up to discover that what used to be a two-lane country road was being widened to make way for a five-lane highway that will enable exhaust-belching cars and trucks to speed past your front door.
 
That’s what is happening to Marlene and Dewey Gray, a retired Gloucester County couple who have lived most of their adult lives in a house on Route 322.
 
The Gloucester County Highway Department purchased the Grays’ front yard to make room for the road expansion, but it wouldn’t buy their house.
 
That means the new highway will come within about 12 feet of their front door.
 
Talk about a lawn job.
 
Trucks that already shake the home when they rumble past will create and an even greater noise-and-safety issue for the Grays, who are in their 70s.
 
The county said it declined to purchase the Grays’ home because it didn’t need the extra land and wanted to keep a lid on the cost.
 
Only a brain-dead bureaucratic agency could come up with such a heartless decision.
 
Taxpayers want government to be good stewards of their money. But the road project is costing $10 million. How much more would the purchase of the Grays’ home add to the overall price?
 
By purchasing only the front yard, the county has created a real hardship for the Grays, who say they would be willing to move to make way for the road.
 
Beyond the safety-and-noise issue, the highway expansion may very well reduce the value of their home and make it difficult to sell.
 
A commercial developer had some interest in purchasing the property, but that went away as the economy slowed. There is no guarantee of when, or if, that interest will reemerge.
 
Regardless, the county owes it to the Grays — who have been paying property taxes on the land for 40 years — to treat them with some dignity and respect.
 
Building a five-lane highway that runs within a few feet of a homeowner’s front door isn’t the type of progress that anyone should expect.
Posted by Inquirer Editorial Board @ 3:00 AM  Permalink | 1 comment
Thursday, November 19, 2009
Former Democratic Louisiana Congressman William Jefferson, center, is followed by reporters as he enters U.S. District Court in Alexandria, Va. on Friday for sentencing in his bribery case accompanied by his wife Andrea Jefferson, right. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

 

Congressmen are getting cranky about the work of a new independent House ethics board, and that’s a good sign.
 
The nonpartisan Office of Congressional Ethics was created at the urging of Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.) in March 2008 to look into complaints against lawmakers and, if necessary, refer them to the House Ethics Committee for possible discipline.
 
The new office was devised because the Ethics Committee wasn’t doing its job of enforcing standards of conduct. Along with the new office, private citizens for the first time would be allowed to file complaints against lawmakers, too.
 
You can tell that the OCE is already rubbing some lawmakers the wrong way. It was assailed by the Ethics Committee for what that panel called a “fundamentally flawed” probe of Rep. Sam Graves (R., Mo.) in a possible conflict-of-interest case. It was the OCE’s first public review of a lawmaker’s actions.
 
Graves had asked one of his wife’s business associates to testify at a congressional hearing. The OCE referred the case to the Ethics Committee, which cleared Graves. The exoneration came despite the OCE’s warning that lawmakers should avoid even the appearance of a conflict.
 
The caution irritated Republicans and Democrats on the Ethics Committee, who argued (erroneously) that there is no such requirement in House rules. They also criticized the OCE for failing to meet its own deadlines, and questioned whether the office should have been allowed to complete the investigation.
 
Clearly, the Ethics Committee doesn’t like others telling it how to do its job. But it’s just as clear that it needs the advice.
 
Before the creation of the OCE, the Ethics Committee was paralyzed by partisanship. At one point, the committee didn’t even meet for more than a year, much less consider action against any lawmakers.
 
While the panel was slumbering, House members of both parties were stealing all the silverware. There were numerous scandals, including the infamous corrupt lobbying network of Jack Abramoff when Republicans ruled the House, not to mention the FBI finding a $90,000 stash of bribe money in the freezer of Rep. William Jefferson (D., La.).
 
The preliminary work of the OCE indicates that there is no shortage of ethics issues since Democrats took control of the House. A confidential report leaked accidentally last month showed that the Ethics Committee had looked into at least 30 lawmakers this year as part of inquiries into possible violations of House rules.
 
Nobody has been accused of wrongdoing, but among the names on the list are Reps. Charles Rangel (D., N.Y.), powerful chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, and Rep. John Murtha (D., Pa.), chairman of the defense appropriations subcommittee.
Murtha and other appropriators are under fire for their questionable relationships with defense contractors.
 
The Ethics Committee has begun full investigations into Reps. Maxine Waters (D., Calif.) and Laura Richardson (D., Calif.), probes that were recommended by the OCE.
 
The committee wants to know if Waters violated ethics rules by helping direct federal bailout money to a Boston bank connected to her husband, and whether Richardson got special favors in a real-estate deal.
 
The OCE’s role in ethics enforcement is important and should be preserved. It’s no accident that the House Ethics Committee is once again busy after a long, self-serving hibernation.
Posted by Inquirer Editorial Board @ 1:00 AM  Permalink | Post a comment
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
President Obama greeting (from left) Buzz Aldrin, Michael Collins, and Neil Armstrong at the White House on July 20, the 40th anniversary of the moon landing. (OLIVIER DOULIERY / Abaca Press)

 

Maybe someone should stick a copy of The Right Stuff into the DVD player Thursday night on President Obama’s long flight back from his mission to Asia.
 
That inspirational movie about America’s first astronauts might help Obama make a decision about the future of manned space flight. A blue-ribbon panel has told him that future will be bleak unless more money is spent.
 
In a recession, such an assessment would appear to be fatal. But some creative thinking might lead to a different conclusion.
 
With his mind on his whirlwind trip to Tokyo, Singapore, Shanghai, Beijing, and Seoul, Obama probably hasn’t had time to appreciate last week’s news that the presence of water on the moon has been confirmed. NASA purposely crashed two spacecraft into a crater at the moon’s south pole and kicked up debris that included ice and water vapor.
 
The discovery ironically came only months after former astronauts in the old Apollo program that first sent men to the moon 30 years ago had urged Obama to give up on plans to go back there and instead concentrate on a manned mission to Mars.
 
In fact, Buzz Aldrin, who walked on the moon in 1969 with Neil Armstrong, said the water discovery doesn’t justify going back. But in his zeal to get to Mars, he may be a bit myopic. Scientists say water on the moon makes it even more ideal as a low-gravity launching pad to deep-space points, including Mars.
 
But there’s the cost. Perhaps seeking a better legacy, President George W. Bush began a program to return U.S. astronauts to the moon and to land a man on Mars by 2020. He didn’t give NASA much more money, though. And while Obama lauded manned space flight on the campaign trail, he hasn’t made a corresponding financial commitment.
 
Obama said that decision would be guided by a committee of experts he appointed. That panel reported in September that NASA would need at least $3 billion added to its annual budget of nearly $19 billion to achieve Bush’s goals. It gave Obama other options, including extending the life of the space shuttle fleet, which is scheduled to be retired next year.
 
Of course, the shuttles can’t take you out to deep space. And they’re so old and patched-up that it’s risky to even keep sending them to the low-orbit International Space Station, which is itself scheduled to be shut down in 2015. The space station, however, does provide another model for Obama that he should consider.
 
Although largely a U.S. enterprise, the space station has been an international effort, with various nations providing components, crew, and scientists. If cost is the primary obstacle to moon and Mars missions that might provide scientific discoveries beneficial all mankind, then why shouldn’t that endeavor, like the space station, be international?
Posted by Inquirer Editorial Board @ 3:00 AM  Permalink | Post a comment
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6
About The Inquirer Editorial Board
Harold Jackson, a winner of the 1991 Pulitzer Prize for Editorial Writing, grew up in Birmingham, Ala., during the civil rights movement. He graduated from Baker University in Baldwin, Kan., in 1975, with a degree in journalism/political science. He has also worked at the Birmingham Post-Herald, United Press International, the Birmingham News, and the Baltimore Sun. He was at The Inquirer in the mid-1980s, returned in 1999, and became editorial page editor in 2007.

Paul Davies is the deputy editor of the Editorial Page. His newspaper career has spanned more than 20 years and includes stints at The Wall Street Journal and the Philadelphia Daily News. He graduated from the University of Delaware and received a masters in journalism from Columbia University, where he was also a Knight-Bagehot Fellow. He was born in Philadelphia and still lives in the city.

Tony Auth began drawing while bedridden for a year and a half at the age of five. He graduated from UCLA in 1965 and worked for six years as a medical illustrator while doing three cartoons a week for various college newspapers. Tony has been happily ensconced as The Inquirer’s editorial cartoonist since 1971. He won a Pulitzer Prize in 1976, and has won numerous other awards, including five Overseas Press Club Awards, the Sigma Delta Chi award for distinguished service in Journalism, and the Herblock and Thomas Nast Prizes. Tony is married to Eliza Drake Auth, a painter of realistic landscapes and portraits.

Trudy Rubin is the foreign affairs columnist for The Philadelphia Inquirer, and a member of The Inquirer’s editorial board. Her column appears twice weekly in The Inquirer and runs regularly in many other newspapers around the United States. She is the author of Willful Blindness: The Bush Administration and Iraq.

Kevin Ferris is an assistant editor on the Editorial Board who oversees the Sunday Currents section and writes a weekly column on a wide range of issues. In his 15 years on the board, he’s handled letters to the editor and the Community Voices pages and has been Commentary Page editor. He started with The Inquirer in 1986, and his assignments have ranged from the copy and news desks to the Chester County bureau and the national/foreign desk.

As an editorial writer for The Inquirer for the past two decades, Russell Cooke has written on a wide range of topics covering government, legal, civic and social issues. Before joining the Editorial Board, he was a reporter in the Inquirer’s City Hall bureau.

Editorial writer Dave Boyer joined The Inquirer in 2002. He writes about politics, government, the economy, sports and many other subjects, but draws the line at writing about "Jon & Kate Plus Eight." He has won journalism awards and insists bribery was not involved. A native of Allentown, Boyer graduated from Penn State. He and his wife reside in Center City, where they enjoy strolling and paying the wage tax.

Melanie Burney joined the editorial board in January 2008 after covering education at the Inquirer for eight years. She previously worked at the Associated Press in Philadelphia and southern New Jersey. She is a graduate of Glassboro State College, now Rowan University, and a member of the National Association of Black Journalists.

Josh Gohlke has been The Inquirer’s op-ed editor since last year, editing the daily commentary page and writing occasional editorials. He came to the Inquirer after eight years at The Record of Bergen County, N.J., first as a reporter covering local and state politics and government and ultimately as the deputy editorial page editor. He also worked as a reporter for several smaller papers in New Jersey and California. Josh was born and raised in Los Angeles and graduated from Stanford University. He lives in Philadelphia.