Philadelphia’s budget crisis all but ended the tax-cutting efforts begun in the early 1990s that are credited with revitalizing Center City and many neighborhoods. So a recent task force report urging a revival of reform comes at an opportune time.
When Bill Ackman speaks, people listen. So, the Pershing Square hedge fund manager got a lot of people’s attention last week when he said he was locking up his money.
Even when we know who, we almost never know why, when the question concerns the abuse of a child.
Harrisburg’s 101-day budget delay was further proof that the legislature is incapable of reforming its unproductive ways.
And it’s all the more reason why the state needs to consider a constitutional convention.
After the pay-raise scandal in 2005, legislators promised to change their broken system of governing. Then-Speaker Dennis O’Brien (R., Phila.) even appointed a commission to recommend reforms in state government.
But the resulting changes were largely window-dressing to temporarily appease the public. The legislature agreed not to vote after 11 p.m., for example, but it dodged more meaningful reforms such as campaign-donor limits.
From soup to nuts, Bill Lobley of River Edge, N.J., has come up with tongue-in-cheek ideas for hosting a dinner party in the midst of a pandemic.
The most important decision facing city voters in this off election year is the race for Philadelphia’s district attorney.
President Obama’s new, more conciliatory position on Sudan has some people scratching their heads. But as he is doing with Afghanistan, Obama is showing he won’t be blindly wedded to a policy that may have been overtaken by events.
For more than a century, Philadelphia has been a one-party political town.
The Republicans ran the city in the first half of the 20th century before corruption scandals swept Democrats into power.
Despite occasional reform efforts over the last 50 years, the Democratic Party machine has hardly presided over an era of good government.
The city was driven to the brink of bankruptcy in the 1980s; its overall tax burden has ballooned to the highest in the nation; and despite Mayor Nutter’s efforts, pay-to-play and patronage still call City Hall home.
The city controller’s office can’t fix all of those ills. But that watchdog post would be in a better position to fight business as usual if it weren’t so tied to the same political machinery.
In the Nov. 3 election for three statewide appellate courts, Pennsylvania voters need to look beyond party labels — if only as a statement that partisan politics has no place in choosing the best judges.
Indeed, the debate swirling around the race to fill one seat on the state Supreme Court is a condemnation of the process of selecting judges by ballot rather than merit-based appointment.
Backers of both the Republican and Democratic candidates have sought votes on the basis that the victor will determine the political balance on the seven-member court, thus playing a role in redrawing legislative districts following the 2010 census.
Such a cynical outlook is just what the state’s judiciary does not need right now, given a crisis of confidence over two Luzerne County judges facing charges for jailing juveniles in a kickback scheme.
Stuck with a bad system, the best that voters can do is pick candidates likely to bring legal scholarship, judicial temperament, ethical standards and a good work ethic.
Federal District Court Judge Eduardo C. Robreno sent the right message in sentencing the former head of a Northeast charter school to more than three years in prison.
Robreno correctly pointed out that Kevin M. O’Shea “did not break into the school in the middle of the night and steal the money. He did so in the daylight.”
O’Shea’s 37-month sentence is a needed warning shot to state education officials, the Philadelphia School District, and other charter-school operators. Robreno called for increased oversight of the taxpayer-funded charters so “this type of criminal activity is not allowed to be repeated.”
High-profile cases like this one are meant to serve as a deterrence to others, in addition to punishing the wrongdoers. That’s in part why the judge gave O’Shea the maximum sentence.



