"The housing correction is at the root of our economic and market difficulties," Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. said yesterday. "The most important thing we can do to mitigate foreclosures and progress through the housing correction is to reduce the cost of mortgage financing, so more families can afford to buy a home, and so homeowners can refinance into more affordable mortgages."
Despite his bailouts of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, home-loan rates "have not come down as much as we may have hoped," Paulson said. But last week's $600 billion Federal Reserve home-loan finance project should drive rates lower, he added. "We continue to look for additional ways to make mortgage credit more affordable," Paulson concluded, "which will stimulate purchases, help to stabilize prices, and end this housing correction." Well, we'd love to see exploitative loan terms replaced by reasonable, affordable arrangements. It's dangerous when the people least able to pay are slapped with the highest payments. We hope Mr. Paulson is making sure the folks using the people's money are being more careful this time. Because if you really don't expect to get paid back, they're not really loans. Paulson's remarks here. (This item expanded from today's print PhillyDeals column)
But this is about execution, not intent. Isn't cheap credit for everyone -- including speculators and homeowners buying beyond their means, and lenders and investors too greedy to care -- what got us into this mess in the first place?
Comment removed.
Laser, 1) Don't you mean "deadbeats"? "Beets" are vegetables. 2) It would still be a tragedy, but it wouldn't be as much of a financial threat if banks thought they could quickly resell foreclosed properties. But as things stand, aren't they afraid of getting stuck with properties no one wants? Might be cheaper to renegotiate some loans with those buyers who can handle lower payments. Joe D. distefj
Paulson has it backwards. Cheap credit is "at the root of our economic and market difficulties" causing people to respond by doing what we always do when thigns are cheap, using more than we need. It caused imbalances in housing, commodities, consumption (versus saving), and, consequently, production versus importation. Paulson almost let's economics through though, by using the word correction. If it's a correction, is it wise to prevent ourselves from being corrected? Isn't using cheap credit to avoid the last correction (2000-2) and get us out of the one before (1992)how we got here in the first place? dreinterests- This is a wonderful opinion. The things mentioned are Great and needs to be appreciated by everyone. Best Mortgage Rates (HTML deleted)
- Bloomberg News
- New York Times Dealbook
- Washington Post Economy Watch
- U.S. propaganda
- Dealbreaker
- Edgar SEC Filings
- Emma Bond Filings
- ACG Philadelphia Deals and Dealmakers
- Seeking Alpha CEO call transcripts
- FCC Documents on Comcast-NBC Universal merger
- Jones Philadelphia Skyline Report
- Grubb Business Real Estate
- Studley Business Real Estate
- Plan Philly
- Penn Praxis
- Technically Philly
- Llenrock real estate blog
- Pennsylvania state budget
- New Jersey state budget
- Philadelphia city budgets
- Delaware 2010 budget
- U.S. budget
- Pennsylvania State Employees Retirement System
- February
- January
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008







