Monday, February 8, 2016

Is free markets' failure the government's fault?

Philly Fed boss Charles I. Plosser says government incentives, and good intentions, damage capitalism and prolong the recession

Is free markets' failure the government's fault?

0 comments

Some "market imperfections... are significant enough to warrant some form of government intervention," admitted Charles I. Plosser, the free-market-oriented economist who runs the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia and represents our struggling regional economy to Fed chairman Ben Bernanke, to his fellow Union League of Philadelphia members in this speech today.

For example, the SEC rightly bans insider trading, he noted.

But Plosser warned that "the tension between our desire for economic stability and our desire for prosperity" has lately sparked "a masssive financial reform law that will generate many new regulations," in a nation where "attempts to insure against bad economic outcomes can sometimes be counterproductive," and "good intentions...yield ugly results," such as a "different crisis" and a  slower economy.

"The financial crisis was not a failure of our capitalist system," Plosser insisted. "Nor was it largely the result of a lot of greedy evildoers whom we could just put in jail to solve the problem.

"Rather, it largely reflected a collection of incentives, some arising in private markets and some created by the government, that motivated individuals to act in ways that proved damaging to the nation's overall economy."

Plosser held off criticizing Obama's new bank reform law. He even called its consumer-protection and credit-claims provisions "a step in the right direction" by setting ground rules to replace "regulatory discretion."

But mostly he leaned on past examples of "bad incentives" that are still with us:

- "Our tax code encourages reliance on debt financing, over equity financing, by making interest payments tax deductible for the (issuer), while dividend payments are not."

- "American consumers have been living beyond their means with too much debt... Our tax code has encouraged such behavior by allowing interest payments to be deducted (from taxes), while taxing capital gains" and dividends to investors.

- "The tax deduction for mortgage interest skews the decision between being a homeowner and a renter."

- The federal "goal of increasing homeownership rates" created "some of the most serious distortions" by allowing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to be "thickly capitalized and highly leveraged" so it "became very profitable for them to grow their portfolios" unil they were "too big to fail" and demanded government bailouts.

- Fannie and Freddie drove "ordinary banks" out of the conventional mortgage market into risky "jumbo and subprime" home loans that "exacerbated the problem."

- Federal deposit insurance "reduces the incentives of depositors to monitor the risk-taking of their bank."

- The federal bankruptcy code gives short-term lenders preference over long-term investors, which gave "incentives for (investment banks) to borrow very short and lend long," which "proved a debilitating strategy" in the late financial crisis.

Plosser called for "better" instead of "more" regulation; he was short on specifics, but longer on principles: "Asking government to insure all manner of firms and individuals agianst bad economic outcomes" will only slow "innovation and econmic growth," he concluded. "We might have less volatility, and, perhaps, less inequality, but we would also have a lower standard of living."
 

0 comments
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy:

Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
 
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

PhillyDeals posts interviews, drafts and updates that Joseph N. DiStefano writes alongside his Sunday and Monday columns and ongoing articles about Philadelphia-area business.

DiStefano studied economics, history and a little engineering at Penn. He taught writing and research at St. Joe’s. He has written for the Inquirer since 1989, except when he left a few times to work at Bloomberg and elsewhere. He wrote the book Comcasted, and raised six kids with his wife, who is a saint.

Reach Joseph N. at JoeD@phillynews.com, 215.854.5194, @PhillyJoeD. Read his blog posts at http://www.philly.com/PhillyDeals and his Inquirer columns at http://www.philly.com/philly/columnists/joseph-distefano/. Bloomberg posts his items at NH BLG_PHILLYDEAL.

Reach Joseph N. at JoeD@phillynews.com or 215 854 5194.

Joseph N. DiStefano
Also on Philly.com:
letter icon Newsletter