Friday, February 5, 2016

In airline merger war, Pa. official sides with Pittsburgh, not Philly

Joining the Obama Justice Department to fight the USAir-American Airlines Kathleen Kane seems more worried about Pittsburgh maintenance jobs than Philly's hopes the deal will add flights and workers

In airline merger war, Pa. official sides with Pittsburgh, not Philly

Kathleen Kane, Pennsylvania Attorney General, May 1, 2013. (Michael S. Wirtz / Staff Photographer)

Joseph N. DiStefano / Inquirer Staff Writer

American Airlines has been trying to move in with US Airways so that, as one big airline, it can make more money (or lose less) than the two have been collecting as separate, formerly bankrupt companies. Who will this help?

-- The people who run Philadelphia say this is good for us. Mayor Nutter says the airline workforce here would greatly benefit. Rob Wonderling, president of the Greater Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce, expects "more nonstop flights to more markets" through Philly. At a pro-merger rally in Washington in September, Rep. Patrick Meehan (R., Pa.), a former federal prosecutor, pronounced the combination fair. Rep. Chaka Fattah (D., Pa.) said it "would strengthen Philadelphia as an international city."

-- But Pittsburgh is worried. The city is home to a US Airways maintenance facility, which the combined airlines might close as they cut costs. US Airways won't promise to keep it open. And US Airways' "failure to deliver on its promises" in previous mergers would make it hard to trust even if it did promise this time, Rich Fitzgerald, executive of Allegheny County, told the city's business weekly last summer. He has repeated the complaint to state Attorney General Kathleen Kane.

Kane has lined up with Pittsburgh, and President Obama's Justice Department, to oppose the merger. Her office says she and her fellow AGs in other states have sifted much evidence and found the deal will be bad for workers and consumers. Asked to review that evidence, her spokesman called it "attorney work product" and said it's secret. 

That might do for prosecutors. But it's an odd way to justify public policy. At least show your work. -- From my column in Sunday's Philadelphia Inquirer. 

We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

PhillyDeals posts interviews, drafts and updates that Joseph N. DiStefano writes alongside his Sunday and Monday columns and ongoing articles about Philadelphia-area business.

DiStefano studied economics, history and a little engineering at Penn. He taught writing and research at St. Joe’s. He has written for the Inquirer since 1989, except when he left a few times to work at Bloomberg and elsewhere. He wrote the book Comcasted, and raised six kids with his wife, who is a saint.

Reach Joseph N. at, 215.854.5194, @PhillyJoeD. Read his blog posts at and his Inquirer columns at Bloomberg posts his items at NH BLG_PHILLYDEAL.

Reach Joseph N. at or 215 854 5194.

Joseph N. DiStefano
Also on
letter icon Newsletter