Friday, August 28, 2015

Gov't housing goals for the poor risk new bailout: US official

Congress is in no rush to fix the broken home market, says FBR analysts Mills and Miller

Gov't housing goals for the poor risk new bailout: US official


After a $148 billion-plus bailout, continued losses, and a refusal by Bank of America and other giant lenders, so far, to eat all their bad home loans instead of passing them on to taxpayers, why hasn't the US government fixed troubled housing finance agencies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?

"Policy makers deemed the situation to be too volatile to tackle" in Obama's bank reform bill, and some in Congress still say "now is not the time," given the "weak" housing market, FBR Capital Markets analysts Edward Mills and Paul J. Miller Jr. tell clients in a report today. 

"This is a complex issue, with many competing interest groups and a political divide," and "we will have to see what the outcome of the midterm elections will be," since the rising Republicans are more skeptical of government guarantees and low-income housing subsidies than today's ruling Democrats.

Any predictions? "Early indications point to a continued government role in housing finance," probably through a single government-supported, non-investor-owned finance company.

In his testimony, Fannie-Freddie regulator Edward J. DeMarco weighed in against increasing the government's already large and "implicit" financial support for the mortgage market: An "explicit" government mortgage guarantee "does not resolve" the obvious conflicts of interest in using government subsidies to promote government housing goals, "and it may produce its own problems." 

If the government guarantees most mortgages, DeMarco added, "it would likely want a say with regard to the allocation or pricing of mortgage credit" to, for example, racial minority groups or low-income neighborhoods. "The potential distortion of the pricing of credit risk from such government involvement risks further taxpayer involvement." 

Also: "Explicit credit support" plus continued federal tax breaks for most US mortgages "would further direct our nation's investment dollars toward housing," DeMarco concludes. Do we really want that?

Links to testimony by Treasury housing boss Michael S. Barr and Fannie-Freddie regulator Edward J. DeMarco here.

We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

PhillyDeals posts drafts, transcripts and updates of Joseph N. DiStefano's columns and stories about Philly-area business, which he's been writing since 1989.

DiStefano studied economics, history and a little engineering at Penn and taught writing at St. Joseph's. He has written thousands of columns and articles for the Inquirer, Bloomberg and other media, wrote the book Comcasted, and raised six children with his wife, who is a saint.

Reach Joseph N. at,, 215.854.5194 or 302.652.2004.

Reach Joseph N. at or 215 854 5194.

Joseph N. DiStefano
Also on
letter icon Newsletter