I wrote yesterday about PA Auditor General Jack Wagner's plea that Pennsylvania ban interest-rate swaps because too many towns that didn't know what they were getting into lost millions, while enriching Wall Street banks and well-connected local consultants.
NEW: Gov. Rendell "would be supportive of something that kept school districts from getting in this situation and getting ripped off," says Rendell spokesman Gary Tuma. He noted state Sen. Lisa Boscola, D-Northampton, who helped get Wagner on this bandwagon after Bethlehem squealed, plans a bill to ban local-government swaps. So would Rendell really ban swaps, after boosting them in a 2003 law? "We would have to look at the specifics."
EARLIER: Scott Shafer, Lower Merion School District business manager, says he and his board knew what they were getting into in 2006 when they swapped the variable-rate interest from a $100 million bond issue used to build new Lower Merion and Harriton High Schools for fixed-rate interest from bank "counterparties."
"We swapped our variable-rate debt and took a 4-percent interest rate for the next 20 years. Historically, if you can lock in an under-5 percent interest rate, that's outstanding," Shafer told me.
But not compared with today's sub-1 percent "exceptional" interest rates, he added. With its swaps, Lower Merion is now paying $4 million more in yearly bond costs than it would have if the schools had gone with plain-vanilla variable-rate bonds. It would cost $11 million to get out of the swap now.
But Shafer knows rates will rise again, and he expects the board will look smart long before the bonds are paid off. "We weren't betting," he told me. "We wanted a fixed rate, and they couldn't guarantee us a fixed rate unless we went into a swap."
Shafer says Lower Merion is unusual: With a top "AAA" credit rating, its borrowing costs are lower than financially challenged city districts like Bethlehem. But he doesn't think it's right to cut Lower Merion's options because of Bethlehem's remorse. Wagner's call for a ban is "a very broad comment," Shafer concluded. -- From today's PhillyDeals column here.
The public focus seems to be on the loss sustained today rather than a picture of a local government's history with the swaps. How has the school district done over a period of years? If three swap transactions are profitable and one is a loser, then on balance the taxpayers come out ahead. Obviously no public official should get into these tranactions w/o understanding the transaction and potential risks and benefits. Some are simple swaps of fixed rate for variable rate but others can get terribly complicated (and if you don't understand it, don't do it). jmcerlane
- Bloomberg News
- New York Times Dealbook
- Washington Post Economy Watch
- U.S. propaganda
- Dealbreaker
- Edgar SEC Filings
- Emma Bond Filings
- ACG Philadelphia Deals and Dealmakers
- Seeking Alpha CEO call transcripts
- FCC Documents on Comcast-NBC Universal merger
- Jones Philadelphia Skyline Report
- Grubb Business Real Estate
- Studley Business Real Estate
- Plan Philly
- Penn Praxis
- Technically Philly
- Llenrock real estate blog
- Pennsylvania state budget
- New Jersey state budget
- Philadelphia city budgets
- Delaware 2010 budget
- U.S. budget
- Pennsylvania State Employees Retirement System
- February
- January
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008







