UPDATE: Sunday Inquirer column here. Obama said this weekend he's against a second stimulus, first needs time.
EARLIER: "The U.S. needs another stimulus package because President Barack Obama’s initial $787 billion plan hasn’t been implemented fast enough," markets scholar and Nobel laureate Robert Shiller of Yale tells Bloomberg LP here. New York University economist Nouriel Roubini, who takes credit for predicting the credit market blow-up, thinks "more spending is necessary to avoid stagnation like Japan’s in the 1990s."
"Obama may need to aim directly at reducing joblessness, said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Economy.com in West Chester, Pennsylvania," in this story. Also in that article: "Among options: enhanced job training, tax credits for businesses that take on new employees or a temporary cut in payroll taxes.
"Hundreds of thousands of lost jobs in industries such as autos and construction haven’t been replaced with new ones, shrinking payrolls by 6.5 million since the recession began in 2007, Labor Department figures show. The June jobless rate reached 9.5 percent, the highest since 1983. 'We are going to have a huge pool of unemployed, second only to the Great Depression,' said Allen Sinai, chief economist at Decision Economics in New York...
"Obama tried to tackle prolonged joblessness in the $787 billion stimulus package Congress passed in February by lengthening and expanding aid to the unemployed. As many as 650,000 workers may exhaust even their extended benefits within three months...
"The U.S. traditionally hasn’t had to deal with long-term joblessness. During the last 30 years, Americans who were thrown out of work took an average 15.8 weeks to find new positions. In June, the average duration of unemployment was 24.5 weeks, the longest since records began in 1948. The number of people collecting unemployment benefits reached a record 6.88 million in the week ended June 27."
We started out with $750 billion in stimulus funds. There has been absolutely no verifiable beneficial result to the taxpayer. AIG of course gave lavish bonuses and exotic junkets to their employees. david wayne
Absolutely, Someone wake up our President and Congress! Just what we need, spend more money they don't have! That will help! What they need to do is set up tariffs to force companies to produce products inside this country to put people back to work! Then they need to cut the size of goverment in half! Then WE need to vote every incumbent out of office because OUR goverment is completely corrupted and controlled by Wall St. Outlaw lobbist and campaine contributions & install term limits! Then investigate the cause of this economic meltdown and throw them all in jail! That's my stimulus package! hexyscores- AIG's bonuses were written into the "stimulus" package by democratic senator Chris Dodd from Connecticut. Why are you not complaining about the bonuses that were paid to the executives from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac? Those are the people who more directly responsible for the economic mess we are currently suffering through, not AIG. Oh, wait, that would mean that democrats would actually own up to making a mistake. And please explain to me why we need a second "stimulus" package if the first one hasn't been "implemented fast enough"? Its just another left wing excuse to bankrupt our country ever further hopster
Comment removed.
Surely President Obama needs to widen his pool of advisors beyond academic economists. We evidently are treading water here, but down in South Florida 6,000 construction workers assembled looking for 1,000 jobs building the new Marlins stadium and a new W hotel on South Beach hired 3% of applicants. A W hotel is more selective than Harvard. My children tell me that classmates frim highest tier colleges are looking for work. Where is the political sense of urgency? John Scanlon
Comment removed.
Comment removed.
Zandi has some good recommendations. Put more money in people's pockets and they will start spending, at least the ones that have jobs. In all seriousness Obama seems utterly clueless about the economy. We were told with this package we would never get above 8% unemployment. We now stand at 9.5, and it would be a miracle if we were not looking at 10% by the fall. The only thing this "Stimulus' seems to be stimulating is democratic special interest groups and bureaucrats. Vote out every incumbent in 2010. They have all failed us. Whoever runs against Obama should pledge to cancel the rest of the stimulus after they take office. beeron
Comment removed.
- Bloomberg News
- New York Times Dealbook
- Washington Post Economy Watch
- U.S. propaganda
- Dealbreaker
- Edgar SEC Filings
- Emma Bond Filings
- ACG Philadelphia Deals and Dealmakers
- Seeking Alpha CEO call transcripts
- FCC Documents on Comcast-NBC Universal merger
- Jones Philadelphia Skyline Report
- Grubb Business Real Estate
- Studley Business Real Estate
- Plan Philly
- Penn Praxis
- Technically Philly
- Llenrock real estate blog
- Pennsylvania state budget
- New Jersey state budget
- Philadelphia city budgets
- Delaware 2010 budget
- U.S. budget
- Pennsylvania State Employees Retirement System
- February
- January
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008







