Wednesday, February 10, 2016

Did Tolls dump stock to avoid housing wreck?

"Like he is auditioning to replace Jim Cramer on 'Mad Money'"

Did Tolls dump stock to avoid housing wreck?


"An investor in Toll Brothers Inc., the largest U.S. luxury homebuilder, can proceed with claims executives misled shareholders about the company’s prospects while they sold stock worth $615 million," Bloomberg reporter Jeff Feeley wrote here, citing a ruling by Delaware Chancery Court Judge Travis Laster. Toll declined comment on the litigation.

Story adds: "Toll Brothers officials must face investors’ claims they improperly issued bullish forecasts for fiscal years 2006 and 2007 in the face of falling demand for the company’s homes... 'Coupled with massive sales of securities,' statements by officials touting Toll Brothers’ performance amounted 'to a red flag,' Laster said in his 49-page ruling."

Refusing to dismiss the case, filed by shareholder Milton Pfeiffer as a "derivative" action, Laster cited "public statements by company co-founder Robert Toll in the summer of 2005 that the homebuilder’s sales wouldn’t slow because it had continued to 'rock and roll' during other periods in which interest rates rose. Toll also described the stock as 'fabulous' and a 'tremendous' buy at the same time he was selling large blocks of his shares...

“'A senior executive can be bullish about his company without sounding like he is auditioning to replace Jim Cramer on ‘Mad Money,' Laster said in the ruling. 'Juxtaposed against the allegations about the underlying trends in Toll Brothers’ business, these statements are striking'...

"Laster noted that from late 2004 until the fall of 2005, the defendants sold 14 million shares worth a total of more than $615 million. Bruce and Robert Toll, 'who during their long tenures as co-founders of the company had not previously sold significant amounts of stock, respectively sold 37 percent and 29 percent of their shares,' the judge said." Case is
Pfeiffer v. Bruce E. Toll, Delaware Chancery Court (Wilmington), case 4140

We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

PhillyDeals posts interviews, drafts and updates that Joseph N. DiStefano writes alongside his Sunday and Monday columns and ongoing articles about Philadelphia-area business.

DiStefano studied economics, history and a little engineering at Penn. He taught writing and research at St. Joe’s. He has written for the Inquirer since 1989, except when he left a few times to work at Bloomberg and elsewhere. He wrote the book Comcasted, and raised six kids with his wife, who is a saint.

Reach Joseph N. at, 215.854.5194, @PhillyJoeD. Read his blog posts at and his Inquirer columns at Bloomberg posts his items at NH BLG_PHILLYDEAL.

Reach Joseph N. at or 215 854 5194.

Joseph N. DiStefano
Also on
letter icon Newsletter