Thursday, February 11, 2016

Cliff deal 'problematic at best'

Warns Jim Meyer at Tower Bridge/ Boenning & Scattergood

Cliff deal 'problematic at best'


In case you've forgotten: A previous budget agreement will force $1.2 trillion in both federal tax hikes and government budget cuts, starting next week, which economists say is likely to start a new recession -- a shock that Federal Reserve boss Ben Bernanke calls "the Fiscal Ciff" -- unless Congress and the President agree to a long-term plan that would ease the impact while still trimming the deficit.

They say they're trying -- Senate leaders seem willing to deal -- but conservative House Republicans still want more cuts, less taxes -- and President Obama, post-reelection, isn't feeling much pressure to cut more than he already has. 

Writes veteran market-watcher James M. Meyer, of $1 billion-asset Tower Bridge Advisors, in a report for clients of Conshohocken-based Boenning & Scattergood:

Taxes and other revenue enhancements need to total about the same amount. The Republicans are near the $1 trillion range and the President is asking for about $1.4 trillion... A final agreement might look like the following:

1. Maintaining the Bush tax cuts for those making less than $500,000.

2. For those making more than $500,000, the top tax rate would be up to but no greater than 39.6%.

3. Capital gains and dividends would be taxed at 20% plus the ObamaCare surcharge.

4. Estates would be taxed at 2009 levels. [up from 2010 ‘estate tax holiday’, down from 2009 and previous higher level]

5. There would be an AMT [alternative-minimum tax] fix retroactive to 1/1/12.

6. Either the sequestration will remain in place or it will be replaced by a package of spending cuts totaling about $1.2 trillion. At least half would come from entitlements [Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security] in some specified manner.

7. There will be a pledge to engage in further spending cuts and further tax reform later in 2013, a pledge that probably won’t be fulfilled.

8. There will be an agreement to raise the debt ceiling.

If the above package is wrong, I doubt it is off by a lot. Whether it gets done in December, January or February, I don’t know. However, I don’t believe this package can be broken up.

WHY DEMOCRATS DON'T WANT TO CAVE MORE: A partial agreement just to deal with the middle class tax cuts will take a lot of leverage away from the Democrats. They don’t want to be held hostage to the debt ceiling issues as noted above. But to get there, they clearly have to move on spending.

WHY OBAMA THINKS HE DOESN'T HAVE TO CAVE MORE: The President thinks he earned a mandate in the election to do things his way. For that reason, he isn’t even back to where he was in July 2011 in terms of spending cuts. Theoretically he may be right but that won’t matter if Republicans hold firm on spending. Neither party has the strength to get a one-sided agreement...

INVESTORS ARE ACTING AS IF: Markets still expect a compromise within days or weeks...

That is why markets aren’t caving in. They don’t see a particular solution at the moment. But if you accept that Congress isn’t about to force our nation to default on its debt, then skies will begin to clear by March and life will get back to normal...

WHAT NORMAL MEANS, IN WASHINGTON: Few expect the new Congress to be any more productive than the last one. There will be lots of debate about gun control, tax reform, immigration and energy. But the odds of getting anything done beyond what is essential, like raising the debt ceiling, is problematic at best.

We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

PhillyDeals posts interviews, drafts and updates that Joseph N. DiStefano writes alongside his Sunday and Monday columns and ongoing articles about Philadelphia-area business.

DiStefano studied economics, history and a little engineering at Penn. He taught writing and research at St. Joe’s. He has written for the Inquirer since 1989, except when he left a few times to work at Bloomberg and elsewhere. He wrote the book Comcasted, and raised six kids with his wife, who is a saint.

Reach Joseph N. at, 215.854.5194, @PhillyJoeD. Read his blog posts at and his Inquirer columns at Bloomberg posts his items at NH BLG_PHILLYDEAL.

Reach Joseph N. at or 215 854 5194.

Joseph N. DiStefano
Also on
letter icon Newsletter