Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
share
email
font size
options
 
Thursday, November 19, 2009

The full House of Representatives will likely pass Rep. Paul Kanjorski (D-Pa.)'s "Too Big to Fail" amendment, which allows regulators to break up big, complex, dangerous banks and other companies so they won't have to be bailed out.

But "we do not believe it would pass in the Senate, as finding 60 votes to support more aggressive Too Big to Fail - Systemic Risk legislation is unlikely," predict Scott Valentin and Paul Miller, bank analysts at Friedman Billings Ramsey's FBR Capital Markets in Richmond, in a report to clients.

Of course, "given the popularity of the issue," Kanjorski's amendment has already passed the House banking committee, where Kanjo is the #2 Democrat (after Barney Frank, D-Mass.), by a 38-29, D vs R vote.

And, in today's environment, a tough break-em-up law may gather conservative Republican support, say from Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., who had the foresight to question (though he voted for -- corrected) the Gramm-Leach Act that repealed old limits on banks playing Wall Street.

But President Obama is likely to"apply pressure on lawmakers not to adopt aggressive legislation," instead backing  Sen. Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.)'s proposal, calling for "increasingly regulatory oversight," more capital, and "self-designed failure resolution plans." 

Got that? Self-designed. Because it's not in big companies' interest to self-destruct. Right, Mr. Greenspan?

Posted by Joseph N. DiStefano @ 3:33 PM  Permalink | Post a comment
Comments   
0 comments
About Joseph N. DiStefano
Joseph N. DiStefano writes this blog to feed his PhillyDeals column, which is printed in the business pages of The Philadelphia Inquirer every Sunday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday. Joe has worked at the Inquirer, mostly, since 1988. He has also written for Bloomberg and Gannett, authored the book Comcasted, majored in economics at Penn, and fathered six children. Reach Joe at 215-854-5194 and JoeD@phillynews.com