Posted: Friday, August 29, 2008, 6:11 PM | 5 comments |
 
options
 
Devlin (foreground) and Clark.

STATE COLLEGE, Pa. -- Let me first state that I am not a conspiracy theorist. Let me also state that I don't attend every practice, scrimmage, meeting and workout session that involves Penn State football (In that, I am not alone). But as a beat writer I am privy to certain events and information and thus have some insider knowledge of what occurs behind the iron curtain at the Lasch Building.

I am speaking, of course, about the quarterback decision that was announced earlier this week and the fallout since. One man and his people are happy (Daryll Clark) and another (Pat Devlin) and his people are disappointed -- among other emotions. There have been accusations that the competition was stacked in favor of Clark and that Devlin, a Downingtown product, had no chance despite what was fed to all involved. Before I give my take, let me preface again that I don't know close to everything that occurred during practices, etc., but I do know things and have heard things, in the immortal words of Robert DeNiro's Jake LaMotta in Raging Bull.

Up until the so-called competition began, Clark had played minimally until the Alamo Bowl. People seemed to forget that he was inserted for several plays in the regular season finale against Michigan State. The results were disastrous -- and pretty much not to his fault -- as he was dropped for one loss on a run and tossed an incomplete on another play. Against Texas A&M in the bowl game, he ran very well, scurrying for 50 yards and a touchdown on six carries. Devlin, meanwhile, had yet to play a meaningful down.

When spring practice opened up in March the quarterback race was called a toss up, although writers were already predicting Clark had the job based off the Alamo Bowl and Joe Paterno's penchant for almost always going with the older guy. On March 29, for the first time since anyone could remember, the media was permitted to attend a full practice. It was less than a week into practice, but Devlin clearly looked more polished throwing the ball inside Holuba Hall. Each quarterback took equals reps with the first team, or so it seemed.

Two weeks later, the media again was allowed to attend a practice for the Coaches Clinic scrimmage at Beaver Stadium. Clark, this time, had the upper hand. Devlin had a few errant throws and threw one interception. But he took most of his snaps with the second team against the first team defense while Clark ran mostly with the first team against the second team defense. A week later, when asked about this Devlin said, "I never really said anything to the coaches about it. [The reps] haven't been like that all spring. On Monday, Daryll and I went back to splitting reps. I don't know what went on there."

This was pretty much how it was set up for the Blue-White game, with Clark on the first team going against the No. 2 defense and Devlin with the twos (and sometimes with the ones) against the No. 1 defense. Clark was 9 of 16 for 106 yards and two TDs. Devlin was 12 of 18 for 122 and a TD.

About a month later, Paterno met with the media in King of Prussia for a Nittany Lion Club fundraiser and it appeared that the coach tipped his hand as to who the starter would be. After that, all was fairly quiet until Media Day on Aug. 8 when Paterno said he still wasn't close to deciding. I watched 15 minutes of practice, but the players were mostly running through plays. Devlin, meanwhile, said he expected a fair competition. His father, Mark, knew his son, as a sophomore, would have to do more to supplant an upperclassman. As preseason practice continued, a few of my trusty little birdies told me it was still close, although Devlin had a shaky day in the first scrimmage. Clark, though, wasn't blowing anyone away with his accuracy. Paterno said the decision was essentially made last Friday.

Clark and Devlin were informed of Paterno's decision on Monday. The coach hasn't made it clear what will happen beyond tomorrow's game -- in which both players will run with the first team -- although it appears the starting job is Clark's to lose. Ultimately what should decide who plays -- or if there is a platoon -- is how each performs in game-time conditions. Only then will the coaches really see how each acts under duress. Until there is some clarity -- and maybe there never will be -- this story isn't going to bed. Trust me.

 

Posted by Jeff McLane @ 6:11 PM  Permalink | 5 comments
5
Comments   
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:28 PM, 08/29/2008
    As a fan, I've never seen Pat Devlin play at PSU but have seen Daryll Clark at least a little bit, so it's not fair for me to say who should start. That said, I don't think Clark is a bad choice as i really think he can do some good things...running AND throwing. However, I would not put it past the coaching staff to sort of set up Clark to win the battle...afterall, Clark is a senior. Unless a senior player is obviously worse than an underclassman, the senior will always be JoePa's choice. In the end, I hope the passing game of the Nits is far more consistent than the Morelli years. It seems a shame to waste decent receiving talent.
    MrPhillie
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:22 AM, 08/30/2008
    Clark should have been the starter last year. Devlin is a tremendous talent and will start next year and the year after.
    rjhpsu85
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:10 AM, 08/30/2008
    Clark has 2 yrs of eligibility. Devlin would only start 1 season then.
    PhillyNittanyLion
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:16 AM, 08/31/2008
    Jeff: Enjoy reading your coverage of the Lions. I see, however, that you are a relative "rookie" in covering them. You obviously don't yet know how JoePa "works" things as far as who plays, especially when it comes to quarterbacks. Regardless of what he says in public, MrPhillie is right: the older quarterback ALWAYS starts over the younger quarterback. The foregoing means that Clark was destined to start even before spring practice began. This also means that this was the predictable outcome even if Devlin looked like Dan Marino in practice. The "competition" was over when Paterno played Clark with the first team offense against the second team defense and Devlin with the second team offense against the first team defense in both the Blue-White game. You are correct that the job is Clark's to lose. I am sure Pat and his family don't need any advice from me, but it seems to me that he has two choices: (1) transfer; or (2) keep plugging away. As a loyal PSU fan for 40 years, I sure hope he chooses the latter. He obviously is a big time talent and strange things happen in football (FWIW--Joe must like Pat because he let him throw more than he usually permits a "backup qb" to throw in a blowout game yesterday). I think he still has the chance to win this job--perhaps sooner rather than later.
    bvillebaron
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 4:12 PM, 08/31/2008
    Uh, bvillebaron, I'm not sure if you've read all of my coverage, but I've written numerious times about Paterno's history of playing older over younger. That's a no-brainer. It's almost simply implied every time a story of this nature is written. There have been a few instances that the younger guy has supplanted an older one at quarterback - e.g. Tony Sacca, Zack Mills - but mostly Joe goes with the older guy.
    Jeff McLane


5 comments
About Joe Juliano
Joe Juliano has been a staff writer for The Inquirer for 20 years, covering college sports, golf and the Penn Relays.

This season is Joe's fourth season on the paper's Penn State beat. He previously covered the Nittany Lions for United Press International from 1976 to 1984.

Joe McIntyre is a senior at Penn State majoring in journalism. He covered the Penn State football beat in 2011 for the Daily Collegian. Follow him on Twitter here @JoeMcIntyre5.