Posted: Friday, September 19, 2008, 3:03 PM | 1 comments |
 
options
 

In response to Whitey's counterpoint column in today's Daily News, this blogger would like to say thanks and well done.

Whitey -- one of columnist Rich Hofmann's nicknames -- wrote an intelligent piece on how Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb can and has rallied his team to victories in the past.

This column came one day after yours truly pointed out that the quarterback has had his share of problems finishing games, especially in comparison to the great Tom Brady and some others. My point was that if McNabb wants to be great rather than very good, he has to finish better. I stand by my point, but agree with my good friend Whitey -- no, really, we are good friends -- that McNabb is quite capable of getting the job done.

You don't get to the Super Bowl and come within four points of winning it if you are not capable of getting the job done.

The one problem I had with Whitey's well-written and researched column was that he used the Tampa Bay loss from two seasons ago as an example of a game the quarterback deserved credit for rallying his team that was botched by the defense. That part is true, but you have to take into account that the only reason the Eagles were behind in the first place was because McNabb had thrown two touchdowns to Tampa Bay cornerback Ronde Barber on a day when the Bucs had about as much chance of getting an offensive touchdown as I do of scoring at a supermodel convention.

Barber, by the way, has just two fewer career TD receptions from McNabb than Freddie Mitchell, but that's another story entirely. McNabb also cost the Eagles points at the end of the first half of that Tampa Bay game when he failed to throw a pass in the end zone and let the clock expire without giving David Akers a chance to kick a field goal.

Anyway, I really want to thank Whitey for giving me something to blog about. Without your column, I had nothing.

P.S. I did link to your story this time.

Posted by Bob Brookover @ 3:03 PM  Permalink | 1 comment
1
Comments   
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:29 AM, 09/22/2008
    and mcnabb wouldnt have been in a comeback situation if not for the eagles' defense on monday. he threw picks vs tampa and the defense/special teams allowed tds all day vs dallas. so, what's the difference? someone had to make mistakes in order to be in a comeback situation in the 4th quarter, right? what's the difference of whose fault it was? go back and look at all those comebacks by brady, manning, and elway. are you going to tell me all 47 comebacks by elway were because of bad defensive play alone? not because he made mistakes in the first 3 quarters? why cant it go both ways? it's a team game... you know what? instead of crediting td's anymore, from now on we'll make it a judgment call by a scorer. if a receiver does more on the play to score then the qb doesnt get credit for a td pass. if the line opens a huge hole then the running back wont get credit for a td. it's a team game. enough already. you wrote an article and now a blog? the article wasnt enough? the horse is dead, put the bat down.
    mikeb


1 comments
About Jeff McLane and Jonathan Tamari






Jeff McLane (left) began covering the Eagles in April 2009 after covering college sports and Penn State football in particular. Before that he wrote about high school sports and before that he worked in the mailroom (not quite). Find Jeff on Facebook and follow him on Twitter for instant updates on the Eagles.

Jonathan Tamari (right) began covering the Eagles in April 2010. He previously covered New Jersey state government and politics, reporting and writing about elections, policy debates and the many personalities that drive the Garden State, from three recent governors to the many musicians bidding to write the state song. He has been at the Inquirer since June 2008. Follow him on Twitter at @JonathanTamari.

Download our NEW iPhone app for even more Birds coverage, including app-exclusive videos and analysis. Get it here.

Latest Eagles Videos