share
email
font size
options
 
Monday, September 22, 2008
Brian Westbrook tries to leap over teammate Tra Thomas in the second quarter of the Steelers game. He injured his ankle on the play. (Ron Cortes / Inquirer).

Should the Eagles sit Brian Westbrook or play him Sunday against the Bears?
Play him. They're just not the same team without him.
Sit him. It's a long season, why risk further injury?
Wait and see how he feels later in the week.

Eagles coach Andy Reid described running back Brian Westbrook's situation as day to day after the running back underwent an MRI examination on his right ankle this morning, but the running back admitted on his 950 ESPN radio show this evening that he is still in pain and it's more than a run-of-the-mill sprain.

Westbrook compared it to an injury suffered by teammate Brian Dawkins in the past, but he did not specify which injury. Dawkins missed the final game of last season with a foot injury, but he also had the more severe LisFranc sprain in 2003 when the safety missed nine games.

Asked if it was a high ankle sprain, Westbrook hinted that was the case.

"I know it's not a regular ankle sprain where you take a couple days off and you're fine," Westbrook said. "I think it's closer to being a high ankle sprain than anything else."

The ankle injury, which occured on the first play of the second quarter, knocked Westbrook out of the Eagles' 15-6 win over the Pittsburgh Steelers Sunday. Reid continued to describe the injury as an ankle strain. Westbrook said his right foot got caught in the turf at Lincoln Financial Field after he lost his balance because his left foot landed on teammate Tra Thomas.

"It was painful," Westbrook said on his radio show. "I've sprained my ankle before and I've had different ankle injuries, so I knew it was something. Of course you never know exactly what it is until you get it checked out. I went ahead and got an X-ray, the X-rays were negative and I started rehabbing today. It's going to be painful. I had ligaments and tendons in there that may have been sprained."

Reid, ever the optimist when it comes to injuries, suggested that Westbrook might be able to play Sunday against the Bears in Chicago, but that sounds unlikely.


"He was on crutches yesterday and he's limping around without crutches today," the coach said at his noon news conference. "I guess that's a positive. It will be a race to get him ready for Sunday. It's not torn or damaged, but there is a strain in there, yes."

If Westbrook cannot play, Correll Buckhalter would get the start. Reid said he thought fullback Tony Hunt would be able to return against the Bears after being knocked out of Sunday's game with a concussion in the first quarter.

Reid also seemed to think that quarterback Donovan McNabb will be ready for the Bears.

"Do I think he'll be sore this week? Yeah," Reid said. "He's sore today and I think he'll get progressively better as the week goes on. He's got a contusion on his upper chest."

The coach did not have an update on tight end L.J. Smith, who left the game with a back injury.

It did not sound as if Pro Bowl guard Shawn Andrews was close to returning to the lineup. Reid said Andrews' lower back injury had not improved.

REPLAY IT AGAIN SAM. It’s one thing for the officials to get things wrong on the field because the players and the game move ultra fast in the NFL. But the replay official has the modern technology of super slow motion and plenty of time to get the calls right.

And still replay official Dale Hamer whiffed when he overturned a ruling by line judge Byron Boston that Tony Hunt was down by contact in the first quarter. That should never happen. Hamer’s gaffe cost the Eagles the football and probably at least three points.

The Steelers challenged the play and Hamer determined that Hunt lost the football after simultaneously taking three jarring hits from Pittsburgh players. The Steelers got the ball because Bryant McFadden recovered the fumble.

From the angle that the ball is most visible, it’s clear that Hunt is losing the ball as he goes to the ground. What’s not clear, however, is whether his left knee has already hit the ground when the ball comes loose. Watch the back angle replay, which is the final replay shown by CBS, and it’s clear that Hunt’s knee is down before the ball starts to come loose.

The most conclusive evidence on the replay is how Hunt suffered the concussion that ended his day. Defensive end Orpheus Roye had a running start before applying a helmet-to-helmet hit on the running back. If the NFL watches the replay, it might consider fining Roye. Hunt was hit so hard he almost came out of his pants as he hit the ground.

The comment by Dave 582 makes an outstanding point. Referee Walt Anderson does have the final say on the replay because he's the guy examining the replay from field level. So apologies to Dale Hamer and Dave, but Anderson still got the call wrong.

Posted by Bob Brookover @ 11:00 AM  Permalink | 38 comments
38
Comments   
Posted 11:44 AM, 09/22/2008
robinlupe
I also wondered when the whistle blew
Posted 11:46 AM, 09/22/2008
Troy Winston
Hunt should have taken a lesson out of B West's playbook.....try lunging forward nice and low to 1) pick up extra yards and 2) protect the football....while avoiding concussive hits.
Posted 11:58 AM, 09/22/2008
defg0003
the helmet to helmet hit was obvious in all of the replays. that the TV broadcast crew completely ignored it was mind-numbing. idiots, one and all.
Posted 12:10 PM, 09/22/2008
gho_matt
NFL broadcasters are horrible for the most part, in my opinion. I almost puked at how much the monday night crew was riding Big D's jock.
Posted 12:18 PM, 09/22/2008
hop251
That was absolutely a missed call. Really inexcusable.
Posted 12:19 PM, 09/22/2008
cheesesteak17
only thing worse then NFL broadcasting, is the Sunday Night MLB crew...what did we do to Joe Morgan that he hates the Phils so much and LOVES the Mets? not to mention, the way he pronounces Carlos Betran's name is very annoying.
Posted 12:22 PM, 09/22/2008
daveH
they missed 4 facemask calls from the previous week also.
Posted 12:24 PM, 09/22/2008
deanm828
'Riding Bid D's jock' gho_matt? Could you be any more of a homer? How 'bout the pass interference call that gave the eagles the ball on the 1, to score a TD? Clear as day that the receiver pulled the defender's jersey, and should have been offensive PI. The MNF crew called it, as well as local media I've heard. And even on the Westbrook short-pass TD, there were two flagrant eagles' holding penalties NOT called, that allowed him to waltz into the end-zone - right in front of the ref. Dallas did get away with two blatant head-turning facemasks. I have no prob admitting that. Officiating was suspect thru the game, for/against both teams, but NOT favoring either. Be serious.
Posted 12:25 PM, 09/22/2008
extremebeat
The officiating was terrible for the second straight week! The birds were flagged for numerous "off sides" penalties in the first half that were clearly wrong...in fact, a few times, it appeared that the steelers actually jumped before any of the Eagles ever crossed the line. I can only guess that the Eagles coaches were in the faces of the refs because it wasn't until the second half that they actually started to call the false starts. I also thought that the officiating in the Packers-turds game was awful as well. It is one thing to have to watch when your team is losing because they are getting beat by the other team, but it is excruciating when the refs make calls, or don't make calls, that are obvious to everyone else! While I am on my soap box, I would like to mention how terrible I think the network coverage has been..I was watching the Skins and cards game and there was a play where the cards were called for delay of game. Warner was visibly upset and the talking heads in the booth didn't even mention it...in fact, the play clock wasn't even shown at the bottom of the screen until sometime after that play. Nothing else was mentioned about that until after half time when "what's her face" on the sideline said that the cards were upset that there was 1 second left on the play clock when the ball was snapped. I don't unerstand why she would even mention it if nothing was said about it in the booth to begin with! I know it wasn't the Eagles game and it may not seem like a big deal, but I am just so sick of the guys in the booth talking to hear themselves, and try to show how "smart" they are, instead of giving the viewers quality commentating! Lastly...enough with the sideline reporting!!! Male or female doesn't matter...most of it is useless and trivial and does nothing for the viewer!!
Posted 12:34 PM, 09/22/2008
Dave852
Come on now! You're blaming the wrong guy on the replay. The guy in the booth doesn't decide that, the referee on the field does based on the replay he is fed under the hood. You should know that!
Posted 12:34 PM, 09/22/2008
gordy
I still haven't heard anybody explain to me how the defense can get called for delay of game? The CBS crew (for obvious reasons) seemed very biased towards the Steelers. I still haven't been able to wash the Kornhieser out from the Mon. night. The only thing more ridiculous then his commentating was his combover!
Comment removed.
Posted 12:50 PM, 09/22/2008
tbone pickins
When the whistle blows has no bearing on non-QB fumbles now. And the defense can get called for delay of game if they try to mimic the QB's snap count. Not sure if that's what happened, but I've seen that called last year.
Posted 12:53 PM, 09/22/2008
Barndog
Hunt's fingers were still around the ball when Phil "I love the AFC" Sims was calling it a fumble and the ref blew it out the Steelers jock to confirm it a fumble. Maybe he needs HD to get the call right.
Posted 01:05 PM, 09/22/2008
ithink
I agree with and share everybody's opinions on the bad calls and bad reporting. Gordy's comment on the defensive delay of game is the most aggravating of them all. I was yelling at the TV "Will somebody please explain that penalty!" and I'm still baffled by it. It's unbelievable that the broadcasters totally ignored it. I was also yelling that the only thing that the replay of Tony Hunt's "fumble" should overturn was the no-call on the helmet-to-helmet hit (that the braodcasters also ignored).
About Birds' Eye View Blog

Bob Brookover, left, is in his seventh year of covering the Philadelphia Eagles after spending 15 years covering the Philadelphia Phillies for the Inquirer and two other newspapers. The 45-year-old Brookover lives in Delran with his wife Francine and roots for Notre Dame and Michigan State, the two schools attended by his children, Justine and Ryan. When Notre Dame plays Michigan State, he cheers for the school of the child he likes more at that particular moment.

Jeff McLane, right, joined the Eagles beat in April 2009 after two years of covering colleges, namely Penn State football. Before that he covered high school sports for The Inquirer. Before that he worked in the mailroom (not quite). Informed that his father is no longer covering the Lions, McLane's eldest, three-year-old son said, "You mean Simba, Scar and Mufasa, Daddy?" His two-year-old son -- excited about the move to the Eagles -- said, "Go, Deigo, Go!" or something like that. His wife of five-plus years, however, had a different take on the new job. "Another five years is in question," she said. Check out McLane on Twitter and Facebook for instant updates on the Eagles.