Tuesday, December 1, 2015

Rutgers-Camden's future, on the table

The university's governing boards meet today

Rutgers-Camden's future, on the table


As two Rutgers University governing boards prepare for action on a measure that could block a Borg-like absorption of the Camden campus by Rowan University, the tough-minded young conservatives at SaveJersey.com have released a scathing assessment of the 11th-hour compromise proposal by a trio of  New Jersey Senate Democrats.

The  Save Jersey blogger (and Rutgers-Camden law school alum) Brian McGovern concludes: "Make no mistake, this plan is still a merger between Rutgers and Rowan, the only difference is that for now, the Rutgers name will remain, even if it essentially means nothing."

Noting the notion that a new, semi-autonomous mega-board would oversee a cumbersome amalgam of the two universities, McGovern writes, "essentially, this Joint Board will have the ability to do whatever it wants...Control is ownership. While there is (also) a Rutgers Camden Board being created, this Joint Board has control. That is exactly what the anti-merger movement has been trying to avoid, a school other than Rutgers having significant control over the Camden campus."

Meanwhile, in the interest of fairness, I must also pass along the thoughts of a friend with deep knowledge of higher education in New Jersey -- but no great love for Chris Christie and his Democratic allies in merger mania.

"Rutgers is getting 95% of UMDNJ and what it wants," my friend writes in an email.  "It gets to keep its name on RU-Camden, for the time being...if RU boards pass (a) resolution against this deal, then the legislative leaders and Christie would be justified in going after Rutgers for a major reorganization of the university…a miscalculation here could be catastrophic for the entire university."

Avoiding a catastrophe, of whatever degree, is why I hope the Rutgers boards will not agree to compromise Rutgers-Camden out of existence in all but name.

Inquirer Columnist
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy:

Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog
Blinq is a news commentary blog featuring contributions from Inquirer Metro columnists Kevin Riordan and Daniel Rubin.

Kevin Riordan Inquirer Columnist
Daniel Rubin Inquirer Columnist
Also on Philly.com
letter icon Newsletter