Thursday, September 3, 2015

Hell no, say Rowan faculty

More opposition to a proposed merger with Rutgers-Camden

Hell no, say Rowan faculty


The faculties of Rutgers-Camden and Rowan universities are uniting against a purportedly improved proposal to semi-merge their institutions.

The faculty senate at Rowan, a campus where anti-merger sentiment has until now been more muted than at Rutgers-Camden, issued a statement Sunday questioning key elements of the much-discussed legislative compromise.

"While claiming to improve governance structure for Rowan and Rutgers-Camden, the new legislation (specifically the formation of a joint Board of Governors with 'full authority over all matters concerning the supervision and operations of Rowan University and Rutgers University-Camden') will instead diminish the autonomy and potential growth of both universities," Senate President Eric Milou, a professor of mathematics, said in the statement.

On Monday, Rowan’s board of trustees will hold a special meeting to discuss the merger proposals; last week Rutgers' separate trustee and governor boards jointly declared that their university must be party to Statehouse initiatives to "restructure" higher education in New Jersey. The position emanates from a statement of principles the Rutgers trustees had previously endorsed.

Rowan faculty members, like their counterparts at Rutgers, fear ceding academic, administrative and fiscal autonomy to a bi-campus bureaucratic miasma concocted as a supposedly better version of Gov. Chris Christie’s original proposal, in which the Gloucester County campus would have simply (magically?) absorbed its Camden County neighbor.

While proponents claim some sort of merger is necessary to redress historical funding inequities and to bolster higher education and economic development in South Jersey, critics say the new iteration, outlined last week in semi-twin pieces of legislation introduced in the state Senate and Assembly, has more to do with creating a mechanism for cronyism than assuring local control.

Inquirer Columnist
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog
Blinq is a news commentary blog featuring contributions from Inquirer Metro columnists Kevin Riordan and Daniel Rubin.

Kevin Riordan Inquirer Columnist
Daniel Rubin Inquirer Columnist
Also on
letter icon Newsletter