In Philadelphia Tuesday, 35 Democrats are vying for 10 positions on the Court of Common Pleas.
You've got a couple of deadbeats, a former prosecutor, some able attorneys and experienced jurists, plus nine people determined by the local bar association to be not worthy of the bench.
Good luck remembering who's who.
For 20 years Lynn Marks has worked to change the way Pennsylvania picks its judges.
"I voted this morning," she said. "I'm a politically active lawyer, and I didn't know most of the people running."
She's executive director of Pennsylvanians For Modern Courts.
The appointment of judges is one of her group's priorities. "Voters just don't know anything about (judges') qualifications. It's not the voters' faults," she said. "It's really difficult to get meaningful information about what would make a good judge."
Every candidate will tout his or her toughness on crime, but no one is going to take a detailed position that might disqualify them from service. A judge is supposed to make decisions based solely on fact and law "and not what they said on the campaign trail," Marks said. "It's a crazy system to have people running very political campaigns for a job that's supposed to be non-political and non-partisan."
A surprisingly small number of Philadelphia voters will wind up choosing who fills the bench
Voter turnout on this drippy day is predicted to be small, with no real contest in the Democratic primary for mayor.
When figuring out voter percentages, there are a couple things to keep in mind. Philadelphia's elections rolls suggest either the city's political parties are extremely effectve at making sure people are registered, or the numbers are funny.
The Board of Elections states there are 1,014,088 registered voters. The 2010 census states there are 1,182,169 Philadelphians age 18 or older and eligible to vote. (We need to subtract from the the number of incarcerated felons, who are not supposed to vote. That number is harder to pin down, but it's a healthy one.)
So looking at those two figures, does that mean that a whopping 86 percent of the city's eligible voters are registered?
Not exactly.
There's another number to consider, what the Board of Elections considers 'likely voters.' These are those folks who have voted within the past five years.
That number, 870,974, means that the rate of eligible Philadelphians who might actually vote is roughly three out of four, which still sounds high.
By the time they get down to voting for judges, that number gets a lot smaller.
There is, of course, the possibility, the rolls are swollen with the dead, the impossibly old, the way-too-young, and the incarcerated. A former DOJ lawyer sampled the city data in 2006 and found some softness in the figures. Since then the city has culled the roster.
In the interest of being useful, where do you go to get good information? You could try our endorsements. The Philadelphia Bar Association. Metropolis.phl.
- A List Of Things Thrown Five Minutes Ago
- A Smoke-Filled Room
- Afro-Netizenâ„¢
- artblog
- Attytood
- Balls, Sticks and Stuff
- Swing and A Miss
- Blankbaby
- blonde sagacity
- Citizen Mom
- Daily Sally
- The BM Rant
- How Appealing
- philly
- Philly Future
- Tom Gralish's Photo Blog
- The All Spin Zone
- The700Level.com
- slacktivist
- Suburban Guerrilla
- The Rittenhouse Review
- Philebrity
- Philadelphia Weather
- Above Average Jane
- Beerleaguer
- Phillyist
- Philadelphia Will Do
- The Clog
- This Urban Life
- Changing Skyline
- Books, Inq.
- Philly Skyline
- The Casual Critic
- Philadelphia Restaurants
- Skaroff Blog
- The Long Cut
- The Smedley Log
- Young Philly Politics
- Politics Philly
- Philly Burbs Blogs
- Mental Hopscotch
- The Daily Jive
- TheIlladelph
- The Phanatic
- Mere Cat
- Starting A Landslide In My Ego
- Booman Tribune
- My DD
- 538
- Brad DeLong
- pandagon
- Little Green Footballs
- The Daily Howler
- War & Piece
- Digby
- Instapundit
- Informed Comment
- The Huffington Post
- Pajamas Media
- Daily Kos
- Power Line
- Eschaton
- signandsight
- Der Spiegel Online
- Guardian Unlimited Newsblog
- Global Voices Online
- Economist.com
- Daou Report
- Blogspotting - BusinessWeek Online
- CJR Daily Home
- First Draft by Tim Porter
- Hypergene MediaBlog
- Online Journalism Review
- Poynter Online - Romenesko
- PressThink
- Reflections of a Newsosaur
- editorsweblog.org
- BuzzMachine... by Jeff Jarvis
- DeepBlog
- Joho the Blog
- Technorati
- The Daily Beast
- Some Velvet Blog
- Stereogum
- songsillinois
- Said the Gramophone
- Music (for robots)
- Largehearted Boy
- Wonkette
- WFMU's Beware of the Blog
- THE TOFU HUT
- Spoilt Victorian Child
- Blackmail Is My Life
- Gawker
- Fluxblog
- Blogcritics.org
- ArtsJournal Blog Central
- Arts and Letters Daily
- Slashdot News for nerds, stuff that matters
- Gizmodo
- Dynamist Blog
- Boing Boing: A Directory of Wonderful Things
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- December 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005














