Saturday, November 28, 2015

Christie's gay moves

Conservatives see a mis-step

Christie's gay moves


Gay marriage is so radioactive to far-right Republicans that it may end up burning Chris Christie, despite the political duck-and-cover offered by his referendum proposal.

Consider the pushback against the governor’s nomination of gay, black, Republican attorney Bruce Harris to the New Jersey Supreme Court.

Christie announced the Harris pick (as well as that of not-gay Phillip Kwon) last Monday, the day before the governor blithely upstaged the “we-love-gay-people pageant” -- otherwise known as the N.J. Senate hearing on same-sex marriage -- by calling for a referendum on the issue.

Christie’s shrewd counterpunch to the Democrats’ carefully timed/politically calculated re-embrace of marriage equality certainly looked less overtly negative toward gays in light of the governor’s newsmaking nomination.

But a 2009 email in which Harris advocates same-sex marriage proves he would be an “activist judge,” the Conservative New Jersey website insists.

"It is deeply disturbing that a man nominated to the New Jersey State Supreme Court would so callously disregard the rule of law for his own personal benefit," CNJ says.

Ever-alert to the slightest suggestion of deviation from ideological purity, the site also blasts Christie as a “RINO” (Republican in Name Only).

Inquirer Columnist
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog
Blinq is a news commentary blog featuring contributions from Inquirer Metro columnists Kevin Riordan and Daniel Rubin.

Kevin Riordan Inquirer Columnist
Daniel Rubin Inquirer Columnist
Also on
letter icon Newsletter