Saturday, May 25, 2013
Saturday, May 25, 2013

Christie, silent on Rut-Row

Before 700 South Jersey residents, the governor says nothing the future of two of the region's public universities

2 comments

Christie, silent on Rut-Row

POSTED: Wednesday, June 13, 2012, 12:10 PM
NJ Gov. Christie hosts a town meeting in the Middle School gym in Haddonfield, Tuesday, June 12, 2012. ( TOM GRALISH / Staff Photographer )

No one hoping to ask about the future of Rutgers-Camden and Rowan universities was called upon during Chris Christie’s road show Tuesday in Haddonfield. And the governor’s uplifting performance offered no mention of the controversial proposal.

As you may have heard, Christie’s original call for a Borg-like absorption of R-C by RU has recently been transformed by Democratic legislators into a scheme for some sort of affiliation of, or partnership between, the two South Jersey campuses.

This potentially bipartisan “compromise” is supposed to mollify furious stakeholders enough to enable the governor to meet his stupendously optimistic July 1 deadline to start restructuring higher education.

But the main focus of that statewide reorganization, the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, is now raising questions. Interim president Denise V. Rodgers issued a statement Tuesday against having UMDNJ's School of Osteopathic Medicine, in Stratford, become part of Rowan.

“ The members of the Board of Trustees... are opposed to the transfer of the UMDNJ-School of Osteopathic Medicine (SOM) to Rowan University as proposed in the most recent version of legislation to restructure higher education in the State — the New Jersey Medical and Health Sciences Education Restructuring Act," Rodgers said in the statement. She also noted that the boards at Rutgers and Rowan recently weighed in with their concerns as well.

Undeterred (like Christie), state Sen. Donald Norcross, D-Camden, tells the Gloucester County Times that a deal is eminently do-able.

Rutgers-Camden professor of history emeritus Howard Gillette's blog post today about the Christie show raises yet another stubbornly unanswered question, however.

What will the restructuring cost?

Kevin Riordan @ 12:10 PM  Permalink | 2 comments
2 comments
Comments  (2)
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 5:30 PM, 06/13/2012
    To ElK: I know of no reason why those comments would be unavailable.
    Kevin Riordan
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 5:38 PM, 06/14/2012
    I have found Christie's silence the most mysterious aspect of this whole sorry episode. The best explanation I have seen is Howard Gilette's. In essence this is a bone C. is tossing Norcross and Sweeney: http://gillette.rutgers.edu/2012/06/01/echoes-from-the-past-haunt-prospect-of-a-takeover-deal/
    burelclerk


About this blog
Blinq is a news commentary blog featuring contributions from Inquirer Metro columnists Karen Heller, Kevin Riordan and Daniel Rubin.

E-mail Karen here; read her columns here.

E-mail Kevin here; read his columns here.

E-mail Daniel here; read his columns here.


Metro Mashup
Blog archives:
Past Archives:
Blog Roll