Ok, well trust me, dude, this was big news. And now it's not.
Here is the original item in Slashdot, back on April 22.
"The Guardian is reporting that a recent study at King's College indicates that the average IQ loss of email users was 10 points (or six points more than cannabis users). Details on The Register as well. The Register has a related story about how computers make kids dumb and an apparent "problem-solving deficit disorder" observed in children who use computers. I thought it was television that rotted your brain?"
Slashdot clears the air clears the air in a post last night, and blames the problem on, what else, "rotten science journalism." The author of the report was talking only of a temporary effect. What? And somehow the 8 subjects studied got reported as ten times that much.
Here's the latest:
"Turns out, those endless news reports and blog entries in April about "texting makes you stupid" were inaccurate. As linguist Mark Liberman at LanguageLog now reports by way of apologizing to Wilson, it wasn't Wilson's fault, but that of "rotten science journalism." Psychologist Glenn Wilson was reported to have done a study said that chat and email, as the Guardian put it, "are a greater threat to IQ and concentration than taking cannabis." But Wilson says, "This...is a temporary distraction effectnot a permanent loss of IQ. The equivalences with smoking pot and losing sleep were made by others, against my counsel, and 8 [subjects] somehow became '80 clinical trials.'"
Someone must have been emailing too much when they wrote that sucker up in April.