Posted: Friday, June 12, 2009, 9:02 AM | 117 comments |
 
options
 

ESPN is reporting that Donovan McNabb's new contract adds a potential total of $6.3 million to the value of the deal over two seasons, including incentives. It was worth $19.2 million and now it could be worth $25.5 million.

You wonder if Andy Reid knew it would cost the team that much when he benched McNabb that day in Baltimore.

Because that's what this is -- flowers, candy and $6.3 million all wrapped up in a pretty bow. It isn't an apology, not exactly, but it is an acknowledgment that the relationship changed on the day when Reid had quarterbacks coach Pat Shurmur tell a terribly-struggling McNabb to sit down at halftime against the Baltimore Ravens. McNabb was personally offended and could not hide the fact. He would never acknowledge the struggles and would never acknowledge that aftermath -- that is, he ended a month-long slump and played much better after the benching.

It was more than that, though -- because despite Reid's denials, everybody believes that backup Kevin Kolb would have retained the job if he had found a way to beat the Ravens that day in a pretty impossible situation for a young quarterback. The truth was, McNabb's contract had made him disposable.

This contract makes him less disposable, at least a little bit. That the deal was not extended beyond 2010 is significant, leaving all options open. But in the here and now, depending upon the level of guarantees put into the deal for 2010, another benching just got less likely from a financial standpoint.

So, on a cosmic level, McNabb got to win one here. He got to reassert his McNabb-ness. He forced the Eagles to demonstrate to the world that he is still strong and still valued. All of this boiled over that day in Baltimore, and now it is finally resolved.

Now, all he has to do is win the last game.

Posted by Rich Hofmann @ 9:02 AM  Permalink | 117 comments
117
Comments   
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:32 AM, 06/12/2009
    Typical pro athlete....... Reid did Mc#5 a favor, so he's bitter.
    AirForceBlue
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:32 AM, 06/12/2009
    eh, they would have had to upgrade his contract either way. you're making a little too much of the benching, Rich. a little too dramatic. he took them to the NFCCG for the 5th time and a lot of lesser QB's (even rookies who haven't played a snap) were getting paid more. those are the main reasons he got more money. that's that.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:33 AM, 06/12/2009
    He's got better weapons, an improved O-line, and a 6.3M candy box. Just win baby...
    Grazman
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:36 AM, 06/12/2009
    Hoffman..Are you telling me that McNabb's previous 10 seasons of work, mulitiple pro-bowls, franchise records and community work has NO ROLE in the decision to guarantee his contract? What about Kolb not looking like he is ready? It was all based on that 1 game in Baltimore? Dude earned it! Give him his props.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:38 AM, 06/12/2009
    I'm not convinced of the cause (benching) for his raise. I think his raise is due to the fact that he's at tail end of his contract, relatively low in pay for comparably talented QBs and he asked for it.
    borntosuffer
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:39 AM, 06/12/2009
    You said it Grazman. No just go win!
    DE_Gene
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:41 AM, 06/12/2009
    This idea of giving him money for the benching is beyond stupid. There is a completely intelligent and business savy reason that they did this. 1) They had the money to spare 2)He is happier now with the organization 3)If he plays poorly for two more years he walks and thats the end of it 4)If he plays good(Superbowl) McNabb is lightyears more likeyly to resign. They will say that, hey, we gave you extra money and that new contract you wanted when we did not have to do so. 5)It is now a win/win situation for the front office.
    samjacobs
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:42 AM, 06/12/2009
    no all you have to do donavan is earn the money.
    thunderstick
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:50 AM, 06/12/2009
    The benching has nothing to do with the contract, other than results. Andy did the right thing - he let #5 know that he could be benched for poor performance just like any other player. Sometimes you have to hit even your best mule in the head with a 2X4 to get its attention. The contract was a result of McNabb improving his performance after that. Even at the higher pay, McNabb will be benched if he gets complacent again.
    dlscholt
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:53 AM, 06/12/2009
    5 deserved the money, but he isn't a King. Kings have rings and 5 has no hardware to speak of. He got the weapons he moaned about and another fat contract. Time for him to pay up. No more excuses.
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:04 AM, 06/12/2009
    Dierte it seems like you have no idea what your talking about. I love Mcnabb so im not hatin on him, and I didnt agree with the benching. But Kolb was thrown in against a defense that knew exactly what we were doing, besides the fact that they are a great defense. Harbaugh had our number that day so bad, and a top 5 nfl quarterback got shut down in the first half what do you expect from a guy getting his first real playing time. I dont know what Kolb is yet but you cant take anything from that game, and Kolb and Maclin played in very similar offenses - im just saying.
    Rabel
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:09 AM, 06/12/2009
    5isaKing - Same as last year except for a few - Maclin, McCoy, Ingram, Peters, Hobbs, Andrews, Jones
    Rabel


View comments: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  | 
About Rich Hofmann
Rich Hofmann arrived at the Daily News in 1980 for a job whose status was officially designated as "full-time, temporary." A senior at Penn at the time, he was hired to fill in on the copy desk during a staff illness. The notion of him covering the Eagles or being a columnist did not exist in anyone's imagination. It was supposed to be six weeks and out, but he never left. It is only one of the reasons why so many people have concerns about him as a potential house guest. Rich has blogged the postseasons of the Flyers and Eagles. E-mail Rich at hofmanr@phillynews.com

Join on Facebook    Follow on Twitter