Posted: Wednesday, January 21, 2009, 12:32 PM | 48 comments |
 
options
 

Best as I can tell, the Eagles blitzed Cardinals quarterback Kurt Warner 13 out of 30 pass plays. It was a ton of blitzing. Thirty percent blitzes is a bunch. The Eagles were just north of 43 percent. It was a lot, and I might even have missed a couple for all I know -- and this doesn't even include when they blitzed on running plays. But it still wasn't enough.

The Eagles' dilemma going into the game was clear. Warner is great against the blitz so they needed to get four-man pass rush pressure. It was the game's most significant imperative. But they couldn't do it, not consistently enough, especially in the first half

Here are the numbers for Warner:

Blitzing: 8-for-13 for 108 yards.

Not blitzing: 13-for-15 for 171 yards and four touchdowns.

There is a chance my numbers are off by a little -- stuff happens quickly and television replays don't always show you what you need to see. But the numbers are pretty close, and they are devastating for the Eagles' front four. Trent Cole was a force in the third quarter but was about it -- and, honestly, most of those pressures came on blitzes. The four-man rush, though, just wasn't enough. And that is fully acknowledging that Warner is a pro's pro, very accurate and very good at recognizing pressure and getting rid of the ball.

I don't know what the Eagles could have done differently. I mean, you can't blitz 60 percent of the time against a good quarterback, can you? The Eagles are incredibly high-risk as it is -- it's hard to see them adding more risk.

Again, best as I can tell, the blitzing percentages were virtually the same in both halves, too. It did seem as if they added a sixth pass rusher more often in the second half, and maybe that was part of their overall success in the third quarter (while doubling the risk on each play). But at the end, on that last drive, the Eagles blitzed twice and got there neither time. Two completions to Larry Fitzgerald were the result, 15 yard and 18 yards, by far the two longest plays on a 14-play, 72-yard drive that cut the heart out of the Eagles' defense.

Risk, reward, and the failure of the four-man pass rush. That really was the story, even as we fixate on the other side of the ball.

Posted by Rich Hofmann @ 12:32 PM  Permalink | 48 comments
48
Comments   
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:11 PM, 01/21/2009
    Kurt Warner looks like he loves the blitz. He reads and reacts so quickly, I don't see how blitzing more would have helped. I think that is what killed the Eagles - their defense relies heavily on rattling the opposing QB with the blitz. That approach doesn't work with Warner.
    Bobphxville
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:41 PM, 01/21/2009
    after the pitt game i dont know why they dont bliss almost every play...
    dsoul
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:41 PM, 01/21/2009
    My view: pressure is irrelevant unless you're disrupting the quick passes. Except for the flea-flicker, I don't remember a Warner pass more than maybe 8 yards -- it was all YAC resulting from receivers being able to catch the pass and get to full speed before encountering an Eagles defender. A strategy of blitzing with the secondary laying 5 yards off of the line of scrimmage was doomed.
    rossovich
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:51 PM, 01/21/2009
    I'd rather have seen them double fitzgerald a bit more!
    joeb
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:58 PM, 01/21/2009
    Blitz or no blitz you can't let Fitzgerald run free in your secondary.
    homer2811
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:09 PM, 01/21/2009
    Give it up already! The game is over and we have to wait for next year. Why are you still trying to figure out why they lost?
    scars73
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:13 PM, 01/21/2009
    I'm so tired of hearing about Warner, he's way overrated.
    RocketC
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:15 PM, 01/21/2009
    Johnson was outcoached. The Eagle coaching staff always gets outcoached in the BIG game.
    GANick
  • Comment removed.
  • Comment removed.
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 3:08 PM, 01/21/2009
    Our young linebackers did not play well. I heard they were telegraphing the blitz. The good thing is, they will learn from this.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 3:16 PM, 01/21/2009
    Yeah LJL, those are pretty good numbers. But he had the recievers to catch the ball early with the Rams (the greatest show on turf) and now with Arizona (two probowlers, including the best player in the NFL). Give me those receivers, and I make the Pro Bowl. In between he was an interception and fumble machine, when he wasn't warming up the bench.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 3:30 PM, 01/21/2009
    I may be wrong but in the first matchup, I think hanson stuck fitzgerald and checked him off the line almost every play and obviously seemed to do a better job than samuel and sheldon. Regardless Fitzgerald played the game of his life and willed them to win. If there was a best out of three, Eagles take it. Jim johnson doesnt get beat the same way twice. They ran out of gas on the last drive, but shut them down the rest of the second half. Problem was that they gave up too much in the first half. I still think their defense is very good. They must retain Hanson. He quiely was a very important link in the chain.
    ag


View comments: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4
About Rich Hofmann
Rich Hofmann arrived at the Daily News in 1980 for a job whose status was officially designated as "full-time, temporary." A senior at Penn at the time, he was hired to fill in on the copy desk during a staff illness. The notion of him covering the Eagles or being a columnist did not exist in anyone's imagination. It was supposed to be six weeks and out, but he never left. It is only one of the reasons why so many people have concerns about him as a potential house guest. Rich has blogged the postseasons of the Flyers and Eagles. E-mail Rich at hofmanr@phillynews.com

Join on Facebook    Follow on Twitter