Thursday, February 11, 2016

Baseball union lets down Romero

Why the union is to blame in the JC Romero mess.

Baseball union lets down Romero

Phillies reliever J.C. Romero is pictured during the World Series parade. He faces a 50-game suspension for being "negligent" in not knowing what was in a supplement he took. (Clem Murray / File photo)
Phillies reliever J.C. Romero is pictured during the World Series parade. He faces a 50-game suspension for being "negligent" in not knowing what was in a supplement he took. (Clem Murray / File photo)

It's a lousy result, a 50-game suspension for Phils reliever J.C. Romero.

And it's the union's fault.

You have heard the basics by now: that Romero bought a supplement in a Cherry Hill nutrition store, that a Phillies' trainer was unable to tell him if it was OK, that the label did not contain any of baseball's banned substances, and that Romero subsequently tested positive. Romero has told the Inquirer and that he did not knowingly ingest a banned substance.

People want to paint baseball as the villain here. That's wrong. It's the union.

More coverage
Download FREE Philly Sports Now app for iPhone!
Final season stats for Phillies
Buy Phillies jerseys and other gear
WATCH: Daily fantasy baseball updates

The most telling quote in any of the reporting so far came from a November letter that the union sent to players. Quoting from the story, which cited the letter:

"We have previously told you there is no reason to believe a supplement bought at a U.S. based retail store could cause you to test positive under our Drug Program. That is no longer true. We have recently learned of three substances which can be bought over the counter at stores in the United States that will cause you to test positive. These three supplements were purchased at a GNC and Vitamin Shoppe in the U.S."

Fat lot of good it does Romero now.

You can't blame baseball for the suspension -- or for the suspension of Yankees pitcher Sergio Mitre -- because "I didn't know" cannot be a valid excuse if your intention is to run a serious drug-testing program. But if the reason Romero ultimately took the supplement, the reason he thought it was OK, was because he bought it over the counter and the union gave its universal blessing to every bottle of synthetically-engineered crap on every store shelf in the whole entire United States of America, well, it would seem to me that the union has some explaining to do. As in, how could it possibly take such an irresponsibly-liberal approach to this business?

For its part, the union issued a statement:

"Mitre and Romero both legally purchased nutritional supplements from national chain
stores in the United States. Nothing on the labels of those supplements indicated that they
contained a trace amount of a substance prohibited under Major League Baseball's Joint Drug
Prevention and Treatment Program. Neither player intentionally ingested this prohibited
substance, but the arbitrator nevertheless found, wrongly in our view, that the players' conduct
violated the Program’s "no fault or negligence" standard.

"The Union respects the arbitration process and treats the decision as final. In our view,
though, the resulting discipline imposed upon Mitre and Romero is unfair. These players should
not be suspended. Their unknowing actions plainly are distinguishable from those of a person
who intentionally used an illegal performance-enhancing substance.

"The Association and the Commissioner's Office must now act to prevent future similar
occurrences within baseball. The Association remains committed to a strong Joint Drug Program,
but will continue to advocate forcefully for fair treatment of our members."

To repeat: fat lot of good it does Romero now.

Daily News Executive Sports Editor
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog
Rich Hofmann arrived at the Daily News in 1980 for a job whose status was officially designated as "full-time, temporary." A senior at Penn at the time, he was hired to fill in on the copy desk during a staff illness. The notion of him covering the Eagles or being a columnist did not exist in anyone's imagination. It was supposed to be six weeks and out, but he never left. It is only one of the reasons why so many people have concerns about him as a potential house guest. Rich has blogged the postseasons of the Flyers and Eagles. E-mail Rich at Reach Rich at

Rich Hofmann Daily News Executive Sports Editor
Latest Videos:
Also on
letter icon Newsletter