Tuesday, February 9, 2016

The ethical treatment of animal lovers

Could Philadelphia possibly have reached ethics overload? City Council is right now engaged in a group grapple with the Nutter administration and various ethical entities (Board of Ethics, Inspector General, Committee of Seventy), over whether city government has become an unconstitutionally hostile workplace for public service. At least on the question of political activity for lower level employees, not to mention volunteers on advisory boards, it would seem the constraints could stand some loosening.

The ethical treatment of animal lovers

0 comments

Could Philadelphia possibly have reached ethics overload? City Council is right now engaged in a group grapple with the Nutter administration and various ethical entities (Board of Ethics, Inspector General, Committee of Seventy), over whether city government has become an unconstitutionally hostile workplace for public service. At least on the question of political activity for lower level employees, not to mention volunteers on advisory boards, it would seem the constraints could stand some loosening.

Last month, for instance, Deputy Mayor Donald F. Schwarz felt compelled to request an opinion of the Board of Ethics about whether unpaid members of a new Animal Advisory Committee could participate in any political activity and still serve. That would include wearing a campaign button for your favorite candidate.

The answer is yes. As unpaid members of a purely advisory board, Animal Advisory Committee members are not subject to political restraints, according to a six-page opinion from the Ethics Board. But committee members would have to complete financial disclosure forms -- which are public documents outlining personal finances -- and attend annual ethics training. Is that too much to ask from a bunch of dog lovers and cat fanciers?

It should all come to a head by June. That's the deadline set by Council leaders to pass legislation asking voters to change the city's Home Rule Charter in a November referendum. That legislation would allow Council to change the rules on political activity by city employees (and volunteers) by legislation rather than changes to the Charter, which require voter approval.  Stay tuned.

Click here for Philly.com's politics page.

0 comments
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy:

Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
 
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

The Philadelphia Inquirer's Chris Hepp, Tricia Nadolny, Julia Terruso, and Claudia Vargas take you inside Philadelphia's City Hall.

Inquirer City Hall Staff
Also on Philly.com
letter icon Newsletter