Thursday, September 3, 2015

Council Members Want Administration to Analyze Bill

Five City Council members have asked the Nutter administration to provide a “fiscal impact statement” examining the possible consequences of Councilman W. Wilson Goode Jr.’s bill to alter the 10-year tax abatement on new construction.

Council Members Want Administration to Analyze Bill

0 comments

Five City Council members have asked the Nutter administration to provide a “fiscal impact statement” examining the possible consequences of Councilman W. Wilson Goode Jr.’s bill to alter the 10-year tax abatement on new construction.

This is the first such statement Council members have requested since passing a law in the spring allowing them to seek an administration analysis of the costs and benefits on most bills.

Goode has been working for more than a year to change the 10-year tax abatement, which lets the owners of new homes to pay almost nothing in property taxes for a decade.

His latest proposal would end the abatement on the portion of property taxes that goes to the School District of Philadelphia, a move that ties his quest to the district’s ongoing financial crisis.

About 55 percent of property taxes go to the schools, meaning a 10-year tax abatement under Goode’s bill would apply only to 45 percent of a new home’s worth. The homeowner would pay taxes on the remaining 55 percent.

The tax abatement has been credited with sparking the building boom in Center City and surrounding neighborhoods in the previous decade, and developers have warned about the consequences of changing the incentive.

The request for a fiscal impact statement came from Democratic Council members Bill Green, Kenyatta Johnson, Curtis Jones Jr. and Mark Squilla, and Republican member David Oh. Green also was the prime sponsor of the bill that gave Council the ability to request impact statements from the administration.

“In my opinion, having a full understanding of the intended and unintended consequences of any legislation is very important,” Oh said. “Especially when we are talking about the economic health of Philadelphia.”

Johnson and Squilla represent neighborhoods that have been beneficiaries of the building boom, including parts of Center City, Graduate Hospital and Northern Liberties.

Goode has said repeatedly that no studies have shown individual housing projects would have been impossible to build without the abatement.

The Nutter administration has been opposed to changing the abatement program.

Click here for Philly.com's politics page.

0 comments
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy:

Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
 
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

The Philadelphia Inquirer's Chris Hepp, Tricia Nadolny, Julia Terruso, and Claudia Vargas take you inside Philadelphia's City Hall.

Inquirer City Hall Staff
Also on Philly.com
letter icon Newsletter