Thursday, September 3, 2015

Pharma facts 2012: Pharma wants the right to cry fire in a crowded theater

All this week Check Up will be sharing one new Pharma fact a day that was an important breakthrough in the world of pharmaceuticals in 2012. Today, Check Up delves into Pharma's right to promote drugs.

Pharma facts 2012: Pharma wants the right to cry fire in a crowded theater

0 comments

Editor’s Note: All this week Check Up will be sharing one new Pharma fact a day that was an important breakthrough in the world of pharmaceuticals in 2012. Today, Check Up delves into Pharma's right to promote drugs.

This month the US 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals (New York, Connecticut, Vermont) decided in a 2-1 vote that a drug rep who promotes one of his/her company's medications for an unapproved use (known as "off-label") is not violating the law.  Instead the Court believes the right of drug reps to tout snake oil for cancer without FDA approval is protected under the First Amendment's “freedom of speech.”  (See here.)

Pharmaceutical trade groups such as PhRMA are clearly delighted with this ruling because earlier this year, GlaxoSmithKline – long a major presence in the Philadelphia area – paid a $3 billion fine for promoting at least four of their products (Wellbutrin, Paxil, Advair and Lamictal) off-label.

The 2nd Circuit Court's ruling comes under the same heading as the US Supreme Court's Citizens United decision in 2010 that allows corporations to anonymously make unlimited political contributions.  Both distort the First Amendment in favor of plutocracy and against popular sovereignty.

In addition to expanding liberty into license for predatory companies, the 2nd Court of Appeals weakens the FDA's power to protect American citizens from the greed of pharmas and their more aggressive sales reps.  While sales reps on the whole are no worse than the average in so far as stealthful deception, they work in an environment that places enormous pressure on them to push unceasingly for more prescriptions, just to keep their jobs.

Justice Felix Frankfurter once wrote that some of our most cherished liberties result from cases dealing with the despicable acts of people who aren't very nice.  That's certainly true.  Cases that developed the modern understanding of the right against self incrimination and protection against unreasonable search and seizure, for example, involved restraining police procedures against people accused of murder and other violent felonies.  But the courts in those cases pursued a delicate balancing act of protecting essential liberties while trying not to encourage the substantively harmful behavior of lowlifes.  The 2nd Court of Appeals, on the other hand, has displayed the balance of a two-day drunkard by precisely encouraging harmful behavior. 

-          Dan Hoffman

President, Pharmaceutical Business Research Associates
0 comments
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy:

Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
 
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

Check Up is a blog for savvy health consumers, covering the latest developments, discoveries, and debates from the Philadelphia area and beyond.

Portions of this blog may also be found in the Inquirer's Sunday Health Section.

Charlotte Sutton Health and Science Editor, Philadelphia Inquirer
Tom Avril Inquirer Staff Writer, heart health and general science
Stacey Burling Inquirer Staff Writer, neuroscience and aging
Marie McCullough Inquirer Staff Writer, cancer and women's health
Michael R. Cohen, R.Ph. President, Institute for Safe Medication Practices
Daniel R. Hoffman, Ph.D. President, Pharmaceutical Business Research Associates
Hooman Noorchashm, M.D., Ph.D. Cardiothoracic surgeon in the Philadelphia area
Amy J. Reed, M.D., Ph.D. Anesthesiologist and Surgical Intensivist in the Philadelphia Area
Latest Health Videos
Also on Philly.com:
letter icon Newsletter