Wednesday, February 10, 2016

Obamacare's opponents just won't stop

Will they ever give up? House Republicans have devised yet another plan to try to undermine the health reform law. This one is an attempt at an end-run around the Supreme Court ruling that upheld it.

Obamacare's opponents just won't stop


by Robert I. Field, Ph.D., J.D., M.P.H.

Will they ever give up? House Republicans have devised yet another plan to try to undermine the health reform law. This one is an attempt at an end-run around the Supreme Court ruling that upheld it.

The Court found that the law’s individual mandate to maintain health insurance is constitutional. It reasoned that the penalty for failure to comply with it functions in the same way as a tax. As such, Congress has broad power under the Constitution to impose it.

The end-run takes that form of an amendment to the law introduced by Rep. Raul Labrador (R-Idaho) to “clarify” that the penalty shall not be construed as a tax. The measure has four Republican co-sponsors.

What’s the point? The Supreme Court found that it makes no difference what Congress actually calls the mandate’s penalty, as long as it functions like a tax. The Labrador bill would have no effect on the way the mandate functions, so in the Court’s eyes, the clarification would be meaningless.

And even if it did have some meaning, the Court isn’t going to re-hear the case.

Moreover, the bill has no chance of passing in the Democratic-controlled Senate or of surviving a certain veto by President Obama.

Obamacare’s opponents have now failed both in their attempt to have the law declared unconstitutional by the courts and in 33 attempts to repeal it in Congress. Isn’t it time they moved on to something else?

It’s not as if they have nothing else to worry about. The House has been debating bills on a range of pressing issues like cyber security, taxes, and emergency farm relief, without anything to show for it. Time spent seeking consensus on issues like those would be much better spent than time spent on yet another futile attempt to revisit health reform.

And most of the country seems to agree. In a recent Kaiser Family Foundation tracking poll, 54% of respondents said they were tired of hearing lawmakers debate the health care law and would like them to move on to other issues.

If Obamacare’s opponents want to do something productive, they could come up with an alternative that has a chance of reducing the number of uninsured as effectively. They have yet to propose anything. 

That is, if they truly want to do something productive.

Professor, Drexel University Kline School of Law & Dornsife School of Public Health
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

Check Up is a blog for savvy health consumers, covering the latest developments, discoveries, and debates from the Philadelphia area and beyond.

Portions of this blog may also be found in the Inquirer's Sunday Health Section.

Charlotte Sutton Health and Science Editor, Philadelphia Inquirer
Tom Avril Inquirer Staff Writer, heart health and general science
Stacey Burling Inquirer Staff Writer, neuroscience and aging
Marie McCullough Inquirer Staff Writer, cancer and women's health
Don Sapatkin Inquirer Staff Writer, public health
David Becker, M.D. Board certified cardiologist, Chestnut Hill Temple Cardiology
Michael R. Cohen, R.Ph. President, Institute for Safe Medication Practices
Daniel R. Hoffman, Ph.D. President, Pharmaceutical Business Research Associates
Hooman Noorchashm, M.D., Ph.D. Cardiothoracic surgeon in the Philadelphia area
Amy J. Reed, M.D., Ph.D. Anesthesiologist and Surgical Intensivist in the Philadelphia Area
Latest Health Videos
Also on
letter icon Newsletter