Even Supreme Court seems to misunderstand Obamacare
No one seems to really understand Obamacare, not even the Supreme Court.
Even Supreme Court seems to misunderstand Obamacare
Robert Field
No one seems to really understand Obamacare, not even the Supreme Court.
In oral arguments last month, Chief Justice John Roberts asked Solicitor General Donald Verrilli to explain why the law requires people to obtain insurance for services they may never need. He noted that the policies Americans will have to purchase “must contain provision for maternity and newborn care, pediatric services and substance abuse treatment.”
Justice Roberts is correct that health reform will require insurance policies to include a set of minimum benefits that the federal government will specify. These will likely be based on the elements of typical small business plans of today, which generally include all of the services that he mentioned.
However, his questioning left the impression that all policies must be comprehensive. That is far from accurate. Americans will be able to satisfy the mandate to have health insurance with a number of different options. These range from “platinum” policies that cover 90 percent of expected medical expenses to “bronze” policies that cover only 60 percent .
The bronze level is quite barebones. The nonprofit and nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation estimates that the annual deductible could be as high as $6,350. And those under 30 can purchase even skimpier policies that cover only catastrophic expenses.
Larry Levitt, head of Kaiser’s Initiative on Health Reform and Private Insurance, thought the Supreme Court questioning could easily leave “the impression that the health care reform law was requiring people to buy Cadillac insurance.” The bronze plan is more like a Mini Cooper with a much lower cost to match its smaller size.
Inexplicably, Verrilli failed to point this out in his response. He never mentioned bronze plans and never contradicted the implication that the law would make everyone buy top dollar coverage.
Obamacare is much less onerous than its opponents claim in other ways, as well. For example, opponents often portray the individual mandate as a new burden that every American will have to bear.
In reality, the vast majority of Americans either already has or would like to have health insurance. They would get it with or without the mandate. And the mandate exempts many of the rest. The Urban Institute, a prominent think tank, estimates that the law would force a mere 6 percent of Americans to ether obtain coverage they might otherwise have avoided or pay a penalty.
Verrilli never made that point, either.
It’s disappointing when a Supreme Court justice seems to misunderstand a key element of a case before him. But it’s incomprehensible when an attorney in the case fails to offer a correction.
The Obama administration has done a woefully poor job of explaining its signature policy initiative to the American public. Its communication strategy before the Supreme Court doesn’t seem to be much better.
To check out more Check Up items go to www.philly.com/checkup
All the more reason to kill it and start over. Those who passed it never read it.— jimmymack- So let me get this straight - a supreme court judge and the defending attorney do not understand Obamacare, but you do? That's a little hard for me to believe.— Paul Brac
- so the argument is if they force us to buy insurance their are plans that are cheaper that don't cover a large portion of the bill. SO we would be forced to buy a service that doesn't cover full cost of medical bills?
And I love how he mentions everyone wants insurance, this is true but no one wants to be forced to buy insurance and people want less to have to buy insurance that doesn't even cover all cost.— argray3
- Abington Memorial Hospital
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
- American Medical Association
- Aria Health
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
- Consumer Medication Safety site from ISMP
- Cooper University Hospital
- Crozer-Keystone Health System
- ECRI Institute
- Inquirer Health & Science
- Institute for Safe Medication Practices
- Jefferson Health System
- Kaiser Health News
- Kennedy Health System
- Lourdes Health System
- Medical Society of New Jersey
- Mercy Health System
- New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services
- New Jersey Hospital Association
- NPR.org Shots
- NYTimes.com: Well
- Penn Medicine
- Pennsylvania Department of Health
- Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council
- Pennsylvania Medical Society
- Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority
- St. Mary Medical Center
- Temple University Health System
- Tenet Healthcare
- The ACP Advocate Blog by Bob Doherty
- The Chester County Hospital
- The Hospital & Healthsystem Association of Pennsylvania
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration
- Virtua
- WSJ.com Health
