Monday, May 20, 2013
Monday, May 20, 2013

American-Style Health Care is a Dirty Word in England

British Prime Minister David Cameron wants to reform the National Health Service. Among his ideas is to promote greater competition. The furious response: How dare he try to create "American-style" health care?

3 comments

American-Style Health Care is a Dirty Word in England

POSTED: Friday, June 24, 2011, 6:00 AM
Filed Under: Robert Field

The leader of a great democracy wants to make his mark by reforming health care. He fears that if left untouched, the system could become so expensive that it will bankrupt the country. Others before him have tried for comprehensive reform but failed.

Political resistance to his plan is fierce. He must proceed with extreme caution. Above all, he must promise voters that the reformed system will look nothing like its dreaded counterpart across the Atlantic Ocean.

The leader in this case is British Prime Minister David Cameron. He wants to reform the National Health Service, the government-run system that covers all citizens. Among his ideas is to promote greater competition among providers, both public and private.

The outcry in response has been furious. Opponents have accused him of trying to make the one change that few in England can abide - creating "American-style" health care.

Most people in England like their system just the way it is. A recent poll found that 59% believe it is the envy of the world. An overwhelming majority, 69%, sees the system as a crucial element of British society and want everything possible done to maintain it. Only 15% would like the system to be completely rebuilt - less than half the percentage who feel this way in the United States.

The British don't think their system is perfect. But nothing seems to scare them more than the thought that it could become like America's. Many find it unbelievable that, at least until Obamacare kicks in, millions of people in the United States who lack insurance can't get needed care.

In response to the backlash, Prime Minister Cameron has scaled back his reform plan substantially. His retreat is seen by some as a defeat, and it may come with a political price.

We can take two lessons from this experience. First, the deeply emotional and divisive health care debates we have had in the U.S. are not unique. It is a highly sensitive subject in many countries.

Second, and perhaps more importantly, critics of foreign systems should be careful of what they condemn. Opponents of Obamacare have stoked fears that it will create British-style health care. They may be throwing stones from a glass house.

To check out more Check Up items go to www.philly.com/checkup

3 comments
Comments  (3)
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:31 AM, 06/24/2011
    Yea? Well good luck getting the care you want in England is the board denies you for any reason. You have no recourse...except flying here and paying for it yourself.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:29 AM, 06/25/2011
    How would you like to be one of the people for whom the state--and it's death panels say " sorry, you're expendable--go die quietly", when a little bit of money may save your life?
    crystalrainbowspirit1
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:11 PM, 06/26/2011
    Let's skip the "how would you like to" and "death panels" rhetoric. I AM a taxpayer, and I don't like seeing hundreds of millions of dollars wasted on unnecessary care. Whether the practice is providing futile care against sound medical advice or it's defensive medicine to avoid spurious lawsuits, I'd like to see my tax money spent more responsibly.
    Doctor D


About this blog

Check Up is your guide to health and medicine across the Philadelphia region.

Brought to you by Philly.com/health and the Philadelphia Inquirer's Health and Science team, this blog covers major health events in our region and offers everything from personal health advice to an expert look at health reform.

Our guest bloggers include:

Reach Check at Checkup@philly.com.

Blog archives:
Past Archives: