Sunday, February 14, 2016

Sestak won't release Navy records

Rep. Joe Sestak says he is not going to turn over Navy personnel records that might rebut the stories he was let go from a top Pentagon job for creating a "poor command climate," which has been used to great effect by Sen. Arlen Specter's campaign.

Sestak won't release Navy records

0 comments

Rep. Joe Sestak says he is not going to turn over Navy personnel records that might rebut the stories he was let go from a top Pentagon job for creating a "poor command climate" among subordinates - an issue which has been used to great effect by Sen. Arlen Specter's Democratic primary campaign.

After Wednesday's "major campaign speech" in Washington, Sestak expressed frustration with the media's role in reporting Specter's attacks on him. It  had been anticipated that he would offer a compelling explanation for his demotion from a three-star admiral position by Adm. Mike Mullen, then the chief of naval operations. Instead, he stuck to his same old explanation that Mullen wanted a new team when he took command of the Navy and he respects the decision.

I asked Sestak why he hasn't released performance reviews from the latter part of his Navy career, which could presumbably clear up the perception that he rode employees too hard and destroyed the morale of hs crew. Such documents could directly rebut the Specter ad highlighting the episode. He said he wouldn't do so because that would allow Specter to drive the conversation - and the campaign.

There should be substantive debate about the country's big challenges: health care, war, recession, Sestak said. "Why are we not discussing those issues, Tom? Because Arlen Specter decides to have baseless negative attacks, is that what it is? We're not going to let him."

(h/t to Pittsburgh Post-Gazette's Dan Malloy for quick transcript of post-speech press avail.)

 

0 comments
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy:

Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
 
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

Commonwealth Confidential gives you regularly updated coverage of the state legislature, the governor and the workings of the state bureaucracy. It is written by Angela Couloumbis in the Inquirer's Harrisburg bureau, based in the statehouse, and by the newspaper's far-flung campaign reporters.



Commonwealth Confidential
Also on Philly.com
letter icon Newsletter