HARRISBURG —The state Supreme Court today ruled that an outright ban on political contribution by gaming interests was unconstitutional and struck down that key provision of Pennsylvania’s 2004 law legalizing slot machines.
The high court found in a case involving a Philadelphia developer that such a ban “clearly, palpably, and plainly” violated free-speech provisions.
The ban restricts “a constitutionally protected form of expression that is no less legitimate or important than other forms of expression,” Chief Justice Ronald Castille wrote on behalf of the court.
The legislature imposed the ban as a firewall against corruption creeping into the fledgling multi-billion dollar gaming industry in the state by preventing wealthy gaming interests from trying to influence politicians.
Considered the nation’s broadest such restrictions, it outlawed all political contributions from a long list of people involved in gaming in the state, from casino license applicants to slot machine makers and suppliers.
But developer Peter DePaul, a part owner of the Foxwoods Casino planned for Philadelphia successfully challenged the restriction, arguing it unfairly singled out one business sector.
Click here for Philly.com's politics page.
- Above Average Jane
- A Smoke Filled Room
- Commonwealth Foundation policy blog
- The Franklin & Marshall polls
- The Field Negro
- Grassroots PA
- Local Values
- Keystone Politics
- Lu Lac Political Letter
- The Morning Call's Capitol Ideas
- The Pennsylvania Progressive
- Pa2010
- PAWatercooler
- Politics PA
- Suburban Guerrilla




