Tuesday, June 30, 2015

Dems: Toomey May Abolish Ed,Commerce, Labor, Energy

Ratcheting up attempts to link Republican U.S. Senate candidate Pat Toomey with Tea Party candidates, Democrat Joe Sestak's campaign is hitting him Tuesday on apparent willingness to consider abolishing the Departments of Education, Commerce, Labor and Energy.

Dems: Toomey May Abolish Ed,Commerce, Labor, Energy

0 comments

Ratcheting up its effort to link Republican U.S. Senate candidate Pat Toomey to Tea Party candidates, Democrat Joe Sestak's campaign is hitting him Tuesday for what it says is a willingness to consider abolishing the Departments of Education, Commerce, Labor and Energy.

The Sestak campaign is citing Toomey's appearance Monday night on Larry Kudlow's show on CNBC. The exchange between Kudlow, who wrote the introduction to Toomey's 2009 book on free-market principles The Road to Prosperity, "demonstrated just how extreme his positions are," the Sestak campaign said in a statement.

 

Here is a transcript:
 
Kudlow: Would you abolish the Labor Department? Would you abolish the Commerce Department? Would you abolish the Energy Department? Would you abolish the Education Department?
 
Toomey: Probably not, Larry. I want to look at individual programs within those departments and see where do we have an opportunity to cut some spending, but I'm not sure that the entire program ought to be abolished."
 
Some of the Tea Party-backed Republican Senate nominees have called for the elimination of one, more or all of those cabinet departments, and Democrats have been attempting to show that Toomey, despite his unflappable reasonable manner, shares some of those views, which they consider extreme.
 
The use of "probably" and "not sure," to Sestak's people, mean that Toomey has not ruled it out. Expect to hear about this on the stump today.
 

0 comments
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy:

Philly.com comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
 
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog

Commonwealth Confidential gives you regularly updated coverage of the state legislature, the governor and the workings of the state bureaucracy. It is written by Angela Couloumbis in the Inquirer's Harrisburg bureau, based in the statehouse, and by the newspaper's far-flung campaign reporters.



Commonwealth Confidential
Also on Philly.com
letter icon Newsletter