Sunday, February 14, 2016

In Defense of Jim Lehrer

Lehrer was trashed for his role as debate moderator; there's another side the story.

In Defense of Jim Lehrer


Jim Lehrer, moderator of last week's first presidential debate, was almost universally trashed for allowing the candidates, especially Mitt Romney, to control the pace of the encounter and for seeming to have no control of the event.

But the problem wasn't Lehrer. The format called for an open exchange to allow candidates to go at each other. Lehrer's role, by design (and by his nature throughout his career), was not to insert himself into arguments or questions but to offer topics for discussion.

He said as much after the debate and again on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" on Monday.

Part of the problem, I'm convinced, is that all of us have grown used to broadcast "journalists" yelling at guests and being more participants in issue discussions than observers who allow both sides to have their say.

Lehrer is old-school and correctly thinks moderators should moderate, not play along.

The problem in the first debate was that President Obama didn't play; he, not Lehrer, allowed Romney to run the show without challenge.

Lehrer is a classy guy, a respected journalist who began his career with newspapers in Texas. He's also a consumately fair interviewer who's won top broadcasting awards, including an Emmy and a Peabody.

(As a matter of full disclosure, I had the pleasure of working with Lehrer years ago on a national public TV project, have seen and talked with him since and so am a biased fan.)

But one thing this first debate did was get folks thinking of alternate formats.

Maybe we should have no moderator.

A friend in New Jersey suggests one of the "debates" be replaced with two editorial board sessions: Obama before the Wall Street Journal ed board taking questions for 45 minutes; Romney before the New York Times ed board doing the same.

Or just put the two on stage and let them go at it.

Both of these ideas are appealing. And either would put more pressure on the candidates than on any single moderator.

Daily News Political Columnist
We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn't contribute to an engaging dialogue.
Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines.

Comment policy: comments are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic. If you see an objectionable post, please report it to us using the "Report Abuse" option.

Please note that comments are monitored by staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable. Personal attacks, especially on other participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Additionally comments that are long, have multiple paragraph breaks, include code, or include hyperlinks may not be posted.

Read 0 comments
comments powered by Disqus
About this blog
John Baer has been covering politics and government for the Daily News since 1987. The National Journal in 2002 called Baer one of the country's top 10 political journalists outside Washington, saying Baer has, "the ability to take the skin off a politician without making it hurt too much." E-mail John at

John is the author of the book "On The Front Lines of Pennsylvania Politics: Twenty-Five Years of Keystone Reporting" (The History Press, 2012). Reach John at

John Baer Daily News Political Columnist
Also on
letter icon Newsletter